Improving Planetary Boundary Layer Height Estimation From Airborne Lidar Instruments

Abstract The height of the planetary boundary layer (PBLH) influences processes such as pollutant distributions, convection, and cloud formation within the troposphere. Aerosol observables play a critical role in deriving the mixed layer height (MLH) using retrieval techniques like the Haar wavelet covariance transform (WCT), which employs gradients in aerosol backscatter to estimate MLH. Currently, backscatter‐only approaches struggle with identifying very shallow stable boundary layers, distinguishing PBL from lofted residual or other aerosol layers, and profiles with very low aerosol loading. Here, we reflect on the WCT method's performance and evaluate different approaches to improve PBLH estimations. We aggregate lidar observables from recent NASA airborne field campaigns and compute MLHs based on the WCT method. Machine learning (ML) approaches are explored to produce PBLH estimates by training lidar information on thermodynamically derived PBLHs over marine and land settings. A linear model is found suitable for producing PBLH estimates in marine settings (improving mean bias by 71 m), while an ensemble tree method proves more suitable for PBLH types over land, as indicated by improved biases (13 m mean bias), errors (179 m mean error and 391 m RMSE), and correlations (+0.3) for the models explored. The algorithms are additionally tested on “unseen” data to gauge differences between MLH and PBLH estimates produced from each of the models. The PBLH estimates, composed of information from lidar and thermodynamic profiles, further support the use of ML for an automated method of PBLH prediction. Overall, these improved predictions will help evaluate models and deepen our understanding of PBL‐aerosol interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042538
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Planetary Boundary Layer Height Estimation From Airborne Lidar Instruments

Pablo E. Saide, Amy Jo Scarino, Brian L. Collister, Rory A. Barton‐Grimley et al.
5 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
4.00
article

Improving Planetary Boundary Layer Height Estimation From Airborne Lidar Instruments

Pablo E. Saide, Amy Jo Scarino, Brian L. Collister, Rory A. Barton‐Grimley, Amin R. Nehrir, Johnathan W. Hair, Julianna Christopoulos, J. E. Collins, R. A. Ferrare
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The height of the planetary boundary layer (PBLH) influences processes such as pollutant distributions, convection, and cloud formation within the troposphere. Aerosol observables play a critical role in deriving the mixed layer height (MLH) using retrieval techniques like the Haar wavelet covariance transform (WCT), which employs gradients in aerosol backscatter to estimate MLH. Currently, backscatter‐only approaches struggle with identifying very shallow stable boundary layers, distinguishing PBL from lofted residual or other aerosol layers, and profiles with very low aerosol loading. Here, we reflect on the WCT method's performance and evaluate different approaches to improve PBLH estimations. We aggregate lidar observables from recent NASA airborne field campaigns and compute MLHs based on the WCT method. Machine learning (ML) approaches are explored to produce PBLH estimates by training lidar information on thermodynamically derived PBLHs over marine and land settings. A linear model is found suitable for producing PBLH estimates in marine settings (improving mean bias by 71 m), while an ensemble tree method proves more suitable for PBLH types over land, as indicated by improved biases (13 m mean bias), errors (179 m mean error and 391 m RMSE), and correlations (+0.3) for the models explored. The algorithms are additionally tested on “unseen” data to gauge differences between MLH and PBLH estimates produced from each of the models. The PBLH estimates, composed of information from lidar and thermodynamic profiles, further support the use of ML for an automated method of PBLH prediction. Overall, these improved predictions will help evaluate models and deepen our understanding of PBL‐aerosol interactions.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(9)
Langley Research Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Coherent (United States) (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Langley Research Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
4.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.