Judicial management and corporate insolvency: comparative insights from Malaysia and UK

A judicial management (JM) assist a distressed company or its creditors operated as a mediator to prepare and table a restructuring plan for creditor's consideration and approval. This task is executed by virtue of Companies Act 2016 (CA) specifically under Division 8, Subdivision 2 and Corporate Rescue Mechanism Rules 2018 under Part III as an alternative and a rescue mechanism to place the company under management of qualified practitioner (Judicial Manager) to manage the debt in order for the distressed company to get better debt settlement arrangement. Thisresearch reviews a prior studies on the application of JM in Malaysia. A pure doctrinal research and desk-based research was conducted to analyze the application of JM, and the relevant comparison of advantages and limitations as well as similarities and differences of its application in Malaysia and in United Kingdom. This research will highlight the gap analysis on the limitation of JM for the improvement for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3058765
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial management and corporate insolvency: comparative insights from Malaysia and UK

Hartinie Abd Aziz, Nurhidayah Abdullah, Zuhairah Ariff Abd Ghadas, Arifha Mohamad et al.
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Judicial management and corporate insolvency: comparative insights from Malaysia and UK

Hartinie Abd Aziz, Nurhidayah Abdullah, Zuhairah Ariff Abd Ghadas, Arifha Mohamad, Mohd Asmadi Mohd Angsor
article en

Abstract

A judicial management (JM) assist a distressed company or its creditors operated as a mediator to prepare and table a restructuring plan for creditor's consideration and approval. This task is executed by virtue of Companies Act 2016 (CA) specifically under Division 8, Subdivision 2 and Corporate Rescue Mechanism Rules 2018 under Part III as an alternative and a rescue mechanism to place the company under management of qualified practitioner (Judicial Manager) to manage the debt in order for the distressed company to get better debt settlement arrangement. Thisresearch reviews a prior studies on the application of JM in Malaysia. A pure doctrinal research and desk-based research was conducted to analyze the application of JM, and the relevant comparison of advantages and limitations as well as similarities and differences of its application in Malaysia and in United Kingdom. This research will highlight the gap analysis on the limitation of JM for the improvement for future research.

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY), University of Malaya (MY), Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.