Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review

Deepfakes are one of the most recent developments in misinformation technology and are capable of superimposing one person's face onto another in video format. The potential of this technology to defame and cause harm is clear. However, despite the grave concerns expressed about deepfakes, these concerns are rarely accompanied with empirical evidence. We present a scoping review of the existing empirical studies that aim to investigate the effects of viewing deepfakes on people's beliefs, memories, and behaviour. Five databases were searched, producing an initial sample of 2004 papers, from which 22 relevant papers were identified, varying in methodology and research methods used. Overall, we found that the early studies on this topic have often produced inconclusive findings regarding the existence of uniquely persuasive or convincing effects of deepfake exposure. Moreover, many experiments demonstrated poor methodology and did not include a non-deepfake comparator (e.g., text-based misinformation). We conclude that speculation and scare mongering about dystopian uses of deepfake technologies has far outpaced experimental research that assess these harms. We close by offering insights on how to conduct improved empirical work in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320124
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review

Matthew P. Aylett, Gillian Murphy, Michael Quayle, John G. Twomey et al.
7 citations
PLoS ONE
Misinformation and Its Impacts
29.41
article

Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review

Matthew P. Aylett, Gillian Murphy, Michael Quayle, John G. Twomey, Conor Linehan, Didier Ching
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Deepfakes are one of the most recent developments in misinformation technology and are capable of superimposing one person's face onto another in video format. The potential of this technology to defame and cause harm is clear. However, despite the grave concerns expressed about deepfakes, these concerns are rarely accompanied with empirical evidence. We present a scoping review of the existing empirical studies that aim to investigate the effects of viewing deepfakes on people's beliefs, memories, and behaviour. Five databases were searched, producing an initial sample of 2004 papers, from which 22 relevant papers were identified, varying in methodology and research methods used. Overall, we found that the early studies on this topic have often produced inconclusive findings regarding the existence of uniquely persuasive or convincing effects of deepfake exposure. Moreover, many experiments demonstrated poor methodology and did not include a non-deepfake comparator (e.g., text-based misinformation). We conclude that speculation and scare mongering about dystopian uses of deepfake technologies has far outpaced experimental research that assess these harms. We close by offering insights on how to conduct improved empirical work in this area.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Science Foundation Ireland (IE), University of Limerick (IE), University College Cork (IE), Heriot-Watt University (GB), CereProc (United Kingdom) (GB), Lero (IE), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Science Foundation Ireland
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
29.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.