Artificial trap‐nests: A useful tool to assess ants and myrmecophiles diversity

Abstract Ant colonies are a source of overlooked biodiversity. Given their cryptic nature and the difficulty of accessing host colonies, studying myrmecophiles associated with arboreal ants is challenging. We used small‐ and large‐diameter bamboo trap‐nests to assess ants and myrmecophiles diversity in the lower shrub and understory strata of a medium‐statured semi‐deciduous forest of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. After 12 weeks, 26.8% of the 128 artificial nests were occupied by 10 ant species (mainly Camponotus and Crematogaster ) and 10.2% by termites. Individual factors (plot, transect, tree, height, trap size) had no influence on the probability of ant colonisation; however, large traps located in the understory were more likely to be occupied. Species with large individuals (head width >1.45 mm) preferred large‐diameter trap‐nests, while small species (head width <1.0 mm) selected small‐diameter trap‐nests. Most ant‐occupied trap‐nests (75.8%) harboured associated organisms (Acari, Collembola, Araneae, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Blattodea and Diptera), with mites predominating (69.7% of colonies). One colony of Crematogaster curvispinosa hosted beetle larvae (probably Monotomidae) and the brood of one Camponotus cressoni colony was parasitized by eucharitid wasps ( Obeza sp.), while two first‐instar eucharitid larvae attacked a single Neoponera crenata larva. This is the first study deliberately focused on unveiling ant‐associated organisms using artificial trap‐nests. Ants readily colonised artificial nests with their associated fauna, revealing a species not observed with other sampling methods. Trap‐nests appear to be a simple, inexpensive and useful complementary method for assessing ant richness and the diversity of ant‐associated organisms in different forest strata.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12833
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial trap‐nests: A useful tool to assess ants and myrmecophiles diversity

Gabriela Pérez‐Lachaud, Fayne Gabriela Estrella-Aranda, Jean‐Paul Lachaud
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
article

Artificial trap‐nests: A useful tool to assess ants and myrmecophiles diversity

Gabriela Pérez‐Lachaud, Fayne Gabriela Estrella-Aranda, Jean‐Paul Lachaud
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ant colonies are a source of overlooked biodiversity. Given their cryptic nature and the difficulty of accessing host colonies, studying myrmecophiles associated with arboreal ants is challenging. We used small‐ and large‐diameter bamboo trap‐nests to assess ants and myrmecophiles diversity in the lower shrub and understory strata of a medium‐statured semi‐deciduous forest of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. After 12 weeks, 26.8% of the 128 artificial nests were occupied by 10 ant species (mainly Camponotus and Crematogaster ) and 10.2% by termites. Individual factors (plot, transect, tree, height, trap size) had no influence on the probability of ant colonisation; however, large traps located in the understory were more likely to be occupied. Species with large individuals (head width >1.45 mm) preferred large‐diameter trap‐nests, while small species (head width <1.0 mm) selected small‐diameter trap‐nests. Most ant‐occupied trap‐nests (75.8%) harboured associated organisms (Acari, Collembola, Araneae, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Blattodea and Diptera), with mites predominating (69.7% of colonies). One colony of Crematogaster curvispinosa hosted beetle larvae (probably Monotomidae) and the brood of one Camponotus cressoni colony was parasitized by eucharitid wasps ( Obeza sp.), while two first‐instar eucharitid larvae attacked a single Neoponera crenata larva. This is the first study deliberately focused on unveiling ant‐associated organisms using artificial trap‐nests. Ants readily colonised artificial nests with their associated fauna, revealing a species not observed with other sampling methods. Trap‐nests appear to be a simple, inexpensive and useful complementary method for assessing ant richness and the diversity of ant‐associated organisms in different forest strata.

Insect Conservation and DiversityVol. 18(4)
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.