Inclusive Language and Culturally Responsive Formal Mentorship:

Despite the numerous benefits of formal faculty mentorship, it remains underutilized within the academy. While there is substantial literature on formal faculty mentorship, there is limited research on the use, and importance, of recognizing culture and utilizing inclusive language within these relationships. The current models of formal faculty mentorship do not include inclusive language as part of their relationally based practices. It is critical to evaluate the role language plays in creating and enhancing these relationships. The use of inclusive language in formal mentoring relationships is important when exploring ways institutions can recruit, retain, and support faculty, specifically historically marginalized groups. To bring attention to this topic, this article presents a conceptual framework integrating components of Relational Cultural Theory (RCT), the ecological perspective, and general systems theory as a mechanism to support faculty through mentorship practices focused on being culturally responsive and using inclusive language. Implications for faculty, institutions, higher education, and the social work profession are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Social Work
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v25i2.7903
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive Language and Culturally Responsive Formal Mentorship:

Dana Holcomb, Megan Gonyer
Critical Social Work
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
article

Inclusive Language and Culturally Responsive Formal Mentorship:

Dana Holcomb, Megan Gonyer
article en

Abstract

Despite the numerous benefits of formal faculty mentorship, it remains underutilized within the academy. While there is substantial literature on formal faculty mentorship, there is limited research on the use, and importance, of recognizing culture and utilizing inclusive language within these relationships. The current models of formal faculty mentorship do not include inclusive language as part of their relationally based practices. It is critical to evaluate the role language plays in creating and enhancing these relationships. The use of inclusive language in formal mentoring relationships is important when exploring ways institutions can recruit, retain, and support faculty, specifically historically marginalized groups. To bring attention to this topic, this article presents a conceptual framework integrating components of Relational Cultural Theory (RCT), the ecological perspective, and general systems theory as a mechanism to support faculty through mentorship practices focused on being culturally responsive and using inclusive language. Implications for faculty, institutions, higher education, and the social work profession are discussed.

Critical Social WorkVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inclusive Language and Culturally Responsive Formal Mentorship: — Dana Holcomb, Megan Gonyer · Critical Social Work (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS