Urgency enforces stimulus-driven action across spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks

It has been shown that urgency in cognitive control tasks elicits a time-window in which responses are dominated by stimuli rather than goals. If stimulus information conflicts with goal-relevant information, urgency impairs goal-directed responses. This was shown for an antisaccade task as well as tasks using manual responses. Critically, however, all previous studies on manual responses used arrows as stimuli, leaving it unclear whether urgency affects cognitive control also in tasks using different stimuli. Here, we show that the urgency effect can also be elicited in three cognitive control tasks that do not use arrow stimuli. Participants completed either a Spatial Stroop task with word stimuli, in which they reacted to the word meaning while ignoring the spatial position, or a Numerical Stroop Task, in which they had to respond to the numerically larger of two presented numbers. The physical size of the numbers varied but was irrelevant to the task. The third task was a Simon task, where participants were instructed to react to the color of a stimulus while ignoring its spatial position. In all tasks, urgency evoked a time window, in which the position or the physical size dominated the response, which was evident from a drop of performance below chance level in conflict situations. These results reveal that the effect of urgency on cognitive control does not depend on arrow stimuli and emerges in a number of other spatially related tasks, specifically in spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks. As such, they suggest that urgency affects cognitive control more generally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322482
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urgency enforces stimulus-driven action across spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks

Christian H. Poth, Anika Krause
6 citations
PLoS ONE
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
8.59
article

Urgency enforces stimulus-driven action across spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks

Christian H. Poth, Anika Krause
article en
6 citations

Abstract

It has been shown that urgency in cognitive control tasks elicits a time-window in which responses are dominated by stimuli rather than goals. If stimulus information conflicts with goal-relevant information, urgency impairs goal-directed responses. This was shown for an antisaccade task as well as tasks using manual responses. Critically, however, all previous studies on manual responses used arrows as stimuli, leaving it unclear whether urgency affects cognitive control also in tasks using different stimuli. Here, we show that the urgency effect can also be elicited in three cognitive control tasks that do not use arrow stimuli. Participants completed either a Spatial Stroop task with word stimuli, in which they reacted to the word meaning while ignoring the spatial position, or a Numerical Stroop Task, in which they had to respond to the numerically larger of two presented numbers. The physical size of the numbers varied but was irrelevant to the task. The third task was a Simon task, where participants were instructed to react to the color of a stimulus while ignoring its spatial position. In all tasks, urgency evoked a time window, in which the position or the physical size dominated the response, which was evident from a drop of performance below chance level in conflict situations. These results reveal that the effect of urgency on cognitive control does not depend on arrow stimuli and emerges in a number of other spatially related tasks, specifically in spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks. As such, they suggest that urgency affects cognitive control more generally.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
8.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.