Health Inequity Profiteering by Private Equity Firms

This article explains how some investment practices of private equity (PE) firms generate profit by taking advantage of inequitably underserved patients in the US health care system. In particular, patients with general medical or mental health needs who seek care at safety-net hospitals or in carceral facilities and patients seeking mental health services are vulnerable to the following PE strategies: purchasing low-quality practices where patients lack opportunities to get care elsewhere, maximizing consolidation of deeply fragmented health service delivery systems, and avoiding accountability for poor-quality service that results from regulatory opacity. For each problem area, the article offers a policy response to mitigate harm to patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The AMA Journal of Ethic
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.361
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health Inequity Profiteering by Private Equity Firms

Colleen M. Grogan, Thomas Statchen
1 citations
The AMA Journal of Ethic
Global Health Care Issues
2.82
article

Health Inequity Profiteering by Private Equity Firms

Colleen M. Grogan, Thomas Statchen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explains how some investment practices of private equity (PE) firms generate profit by taking advantage of inequitably underserved patients in the US health care system. In particular, patients with general medical or mental health needs who seek care at safety-net hospitals or in carceral facilities and patients seeking mental health services are vulnerable to the following PE strategies: purchasing low-quality practices where patients lack opportunities to get care elsewhere, maximizing consolidation of deeply fragmented health service delivery systems, and avoiding accountability for poor-quality service that results from regulatory opacity. For each problem area, the article offers a policy response to mitigate harm to patients.

The AMA Journal of EthicVol. 27(5)
University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Global Health Care Issues
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.