Holistic uncertainty quantification and attribution for real-time seasonal streamflow predictions: Insights from input, parameter and initial condition

Two mesoscale watersheds in the East China, where increased occurrences of hydrometeorological extreme events (drought-flood abrupt alternation) were observed over the last few years. To investigate the impact of different uncertainty sources in seasonal streamflow predictability with lead times from + 1 M to + 9 M, the study proposed an uncertainty quantification and attribution framework leveraged by a three-way ANOVA by considering uncertainties from forcing inputs (CFSs), hydrological model parameters (PARs) and basin initial conditions (ICs). The annual and sub-annual variations in predictability and uncertainty contribution were analyzed and elaborated through four well-designed experiments, by using both deterministic and uncertainty metrics. The results show that CFSs-driven monthly streamflow predictions are effective up to + 3 M. Additionally considering PARs uncertainty enhances the predictability for all lead times, whereas additional consideration of ICs uncertainty exerts a positive impact on streamflow prediction only in shorter lead times (<+2 M). Uncertainty contributions vary in lead times and seasons. For the + 1 M predictions, the uncertainty is influenced by complicated contributors, with 47 % from CFSs, 18 % from ICs, and 17 % from PARs, respectively. Regarding lead times beyond + 1 M, CFSs and PARs are the dominant contributors, with overall contributions exceeding 90 %. Seasonally, ICs and PARs play a dominated role during low-flow period, nevertheless CFSs more pronounced during high-flow period. Our finding provides insights for modelers into the relative impact of individual uncertainty sources in the hydrological forecasting process, and supporting valuable suggestions for related applications. • A holistic uncertainty quantification and attribution is developed for real-time seasonal streamflow prediction. • Uncertainties in CFSs, PARs and ICs and their synergy are analyzed and quantified for sub-annual variations. • Effects of ICs are substantial for lead times <= +3M, for longer lead times the CFSs uncertainty dominated. • Valuable suggestion has been made for regional water resources management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102427
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic uncertainty quantification and attribution for real-time seasonal streamflow predictions: Insights from input, parameter and initial condition

Yue‐Ping Xu, Zhou Peng, Chaohao Zheng, Lu Wang et al.
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Holistic uncertainty quantification and attribution for real-time seasonal streamflow predictions: Insights from input, parameter and initial condition

Yue‐Ping Xu, Zhou Peng, Chaohao Zheng, Lu Wang, Li Liu, Yuxue Guo, Xiao Liang
article en

Abstract

Two mesoscale watersheds in the East China, where increased occurrences of hydrometeorological extreme events (drought-flood abrupt alternation) were observed over the last few years. To investigate the impact of different uncertainty sources in seasonal streamflow predictability with lead times from + 1 M to + 9 M, the study proposed an uncertainty quantification and attribution framework leveraged by a three-way ANOVA by considering uncertainties from forcing inputs (CFSs), hydrological model parameters (PARs) and basin initial conditions (ICs). The annual and sub-annual variations in predictability and uncertainty contribution were analyzed and elaborated through four well-designed experiments, by using both deterministic and uncertainty metrics. The results show that CFSs-driven monthly streamflow predictions are effective up to + 3 M. Additionally considering PARs uncertainty enhances the predictability for all lead times, whereas additional consideration of ICs uncertainty exerts a positive impact on streamflow prediction only in shorter lead times (<+2 M). Uncertainty contributions vary in lead times and seasons. For the + 1 M predictions, the uncertainty is influenced by complicated contributors, with 47 % from CFSs, 18 % from ICs, and 17 % from PARs, respectively. Regarding lead times beyond + 1 M, CFSs and PARs are the dominant contributors, with overall contributions exceeding 90 %. Seasonally, ICs and PARs play a dominated role during low-flow period, nevertheless CFSs more pronounced during high-flow period. Our finding provides insights for modelers into the relative impact of individual uncertainty sources in the hydrological forecasting process, and supporting valuable suggestions for related applications. • A holistic uncertainty quantification and attribution is developed for real-time seasonal streamflow prediction. • Uncertainties in CFSs, PARs and ICs and their synergy are analyzed and quantified for sub-annual variations. • Effects of ICs are substantial for lead times <= +3M, for longer lead times the CFSs uncertainty dominated. • Valuable suggestion has been made for regional water resources management.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 59
Zhejiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design Institute (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.