Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling

This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies. The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO 2 eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO 2 eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life. The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications. • Battery GWP must assessed with technical traits like energy density and cycle life for eco-design. • Battery transport has a low impact on GWP, especially when sourcing from local or regional sites. • Battery recycling reduces GWP by about 39.7%, lowering emissions from production and end-of-life. • GWP for battery production varies by chemistry, averaging 54.2 kgCO 2 eq/kWh for LFP, NMC, NCA and LMO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.116777
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling

Clotilde Robert, Alexandre Ravey, Raphaël Perey, Daniel Hissel
2 citations
Journal of Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
article

Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling

Clotilde Robert, Alexandre Ravey, Raphaël Perey, Daniel Hissel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies. The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO 2 eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO 2 eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life. The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications. • Battery GWP must assessed with technical traits like energy density and cycle life for eco-design. • Battery transport has a low impact on GWP, especially when sourcing from local or regional sites. • Battery recycling reduces GWP by about 39.7%, lowering emissions from production and end-of-life. • GWP for battery production varies by chemistry, averaging 54.2 kgCO 2 eq/kWh for LFP, NMC, NCA and LMO.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 124
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Franche-Comté Électronique Mécanique Thermique et Optique - Sciences et Technologies (FR), Université de technologie de belfort-montbéliard (FR), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.