Duties and Authorities of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency and its Position in the Perspective of the Judicial System in Indonesia

The Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) is an agency specifically established to resolve consumer disputes outside the courts. Normatively, there are many conveniences provided by law to consumers in resolving their disputes through BPSK. However, in its implementation, this is not the case because consumers often experience various difficulties in resolving disputes through BPSK, especially related to the trial process, legal remedies that can be submitted, and the binding force of its decisions. This is more due to its position, which is not appropriate and is outside the Indonesian judicial system, which is based on Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. There are multi-functional duties and authorities, namely executive functions, judicial functions, and advocacy functions. It can be said that from a judicial perspective, BPSK is quasi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i1.359
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Duties and Authorities of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency and its Position in the Perspective of the Judicial System in Indonesia

Paltiada Saragi, Hulman Panjaitan
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Duties and Authorities of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency and its Position in the Perspective of the Judicial System in Indonesia

Paltiada Saragi, Hulman Panjaitan
article en

Abstract

The Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) is an agency specifically established to resolve consumer disputes outside the courts. Normatively, there are many conveniences provided by law to consumers in resolving their disputes through BPSK. However, in its implementation, this is not the case because consumers often experience various difficulties in resolving disputes through BPSK, especially related to the trial process, legal remedies that can be submitted, and the binding force of its decisions. This is more due to its position, which is not appropriate and is outside the Indonesian judicial system, which is based on Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. There are multi-functional duties and authorities, namely executive functions, judicial functions, and advocacy functions. It can be said that from a judicial perspective, BPSK is quasi.

Greenation International Journal of Law and Social SciencesVol. 3(1)
Universitas Kristen Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.