Climate Impact of Direct and Indirect N<sub>2</sub>O Emissions from the Ammonia Marine Fuel Value Chain

Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emerges as a near-zero-carbon shipping fuel, but its value chain can emit noncarbon greenhouse gases (GHGs) like nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and pollutants, such as NH<sub>3</sub> and nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>). N<sub>2</sub>O, with 273 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), is also indirectly emitted through transformations of reactive nitrogen (N<sub>r</sub>) species, like NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, in natural environments. Understanding ammonia's climate impact is crucial for evaluating its efficacy as a fossil fuel alternative. We present a functional model to quantify the climate impact of renewable-based (e-ammonia) and natural-gas-based (blue and gray) ammonia, focusing on direct and indirect N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The model incorporates N<sub>r</sub> emissions─NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O─across the value chain under "low", "medium", and "high" emissions scenarios, along with production and pilot fuel GHG emissions. Results show that e-ammonia's climate benefit depends on well-to-wake N<sub>r</sub> emissions and natural processes that control relevant nitrogen to indirect N<sub>2</sub>O (N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub>) conversion pathways. In a low emissions scenario, its CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent intensity is 68-80% lower than fuel oil, assuming 1-10% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion. In a high emissions scenario, this benefit drops to 11-23% for 1-2% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion, and at 5-10% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion, e-ammonia's impact exceeds fuel oil by >24%. Blue ammonia could bring ∼30% climate benefit compared to fuel oil, but only in a low emissions scenario with 1-2% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion. While more data on emissions and N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion are needed, minimizing NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions is crucial to maximizing ammonia's climate benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c13135
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Impact of Direct and Indirect N2O Emissions from the Ammonia Marine Fuel Value Chain

Sofia Esquivel‐Elizondo, Brian Buma, Stavroula S. Sartzetakis, Blake Walkowiak
11 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
5.70
article

Climate Impact of Direct and Indirect N2O Emissions from the Ammonia Marine Fuel Value Chain

Sofia Esquivel‐Elizondo, Brian Buma, Stavroula S. Sartzetakis, Blake Walkowiak
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emerges as a near-zero-carbon shipping fuel, but its value chain can emit noncarbon greenhouse gases (GHGs) like nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and pollutants, such as NH<sub>3</sub> and nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>). N<sub>2</sub>O, with 273 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), is also indirectly emitted through transformations of reactive nitrogen (N<sub>r</sub>) species, like NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, in natural environments. Understanding ammonia's climate impact is crucial for evaluating its efficacy as a fossil fuel alternative. We present a functional model to quantify the climate impact of renewable-based (e-ammonia) and natural-gas-based (blue and gray) ammonia, focusing on direct and indirect N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The model incorporates N<sub>r</sub> emissions─NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O─across the value chain under "low", "medium", and "high" emissions scenarios, along with production and pilot fuel GHG emissions. Results show that e-ammonia's climate benefit depends on well-to-wake N<sub>r</sub> emissions and natural processes that control relevant nitrogen to indirect N<sub>2</sub>O (N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub>) conversion pathways. In a low emissions scenario, its CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent intensity is 68-80% lower than fuel oil, assuming 1-10% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion. In a high emissions scenario, this benefit drops to 11-23% for 1-2% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion, and at 5-10% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion, e-ammonia's impact exceeds fuel oil by >24%. Blue ammonia could bring ∼30% climate benefit compared to fuel oil, but only in a low emissions scenario with 1-2% N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion. While more data on emissions and N-to-N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>i</sub> conversion are needed, minimizing NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions is crucial to maximizing ammonia's climate benefits.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(18)
Environmental Defense Fund (US)
ClimateWorks Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
5.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.