Marginal ecologies: a framework for studying the social–ecological margins

Abstract Both anthropologists and ecologists have increasingly recognized the need to reach beyond their own disciplinary frameworks when handling processes of marginalization that involve intersecting social–ecological dimensions, particularly as global environmental challenges force humans and wildlife into new and challenging conditions. In this letter, we suggest a cross-disciplinary framework for studying the social–ecological margins. We highlight two definitions of marginality, one from the social sciences and one from the natural sciences, and discuss the relations that render a research subject marginal through four case studies on wildlife and agriculture. This discussion illuminates the importance of studying the behavioral and cultural repertoires with which marginal populations respond to social–ecological constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/add35f
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marginal ecologies: a framework for studying the social–ecological margins

Kaggie Orrick, Katherine Meier, Michael R. Dove, Christian Espinosa Schatz
Environmental Research Letters
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

Marginal ecologies: a framework for studying the social–ecological margins

Kaggie Orrick, Katherine Meier, Michael R. Dove, Christian Espinosa Schatz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Both anthropologists and ecologists have increasingly recognized the need to reach beyond their own disciplinary frameworks when handling processes of marginalization that involve intersecting social–ecological dimensions, particularly as global environmental challenges force humans and wildlife into new and challenging conditions. In this letter, we suggest a cross-disciplinary framework for studying the social–ecological margins. We highlight two definitions of marginality, one from the social sciences and one from the natural sciences, and discuss the relations that render a research subject marginal through four case studies on wildlife and agriculture. This discussion illuminates the importance of studying the behavioral and cultural repertoires with which marginal populations respond to social–ecological constraints.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(7)
Yale University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Social Science Research Council, Primate Conservation, Yale University, Rufford Foundation, Institute for Biospheric Studies, Yale University, Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.