The environmental impact and wellbeing benefits of minimalism

Technological improvements alone will be insufficient to reduce carbon emissions to limit climate change; reducing consumption will also be necessary. Here we investigate minimalism, a low-consumption lifestyle which involves voluntarily reducing material consumption as a possible scalable pathway for consumption reduction. As minimalists aim to own few possessions, they might have a low carbon footprint, but this is yet to be established. This study investigates the environmental impact of minimalism, measured via an ecological footprint calculator in an online survey (N=444). We also investigate wellbeing (measured using life satisfaction and the PANAS), and its association with minimalism. We found that minimalism is negatively associated with ecological footprint and negative affect, positively associated with positive affect, but not associated with life satisfaction. In addition, we investigated subdimensions of minimalism (‘aesthetic’ minimalism, ‘few belongings’ minimalism, and ‘mindful’ minimalism). We found that higher levels of ‘few belongings’ minimalism and ‘mindful’ minimalism were related to a lower ecological footprint, positive affect, and greater environmental concern, while ‘aesthetic’ minimalism was not. ‘Few belongings’ minimalism was also associated with having a more energy efficient house, a smaller goods footprint, purchasing fewer clothes, smaller transport and food footprints, and producing less waste than the other types of minimalism. Our findings suggest that the adoption of minimalism as a low-consumption lifestyle has potential advantages for both the environment and wellbeing, though some facets of minimalism appear more promising than others. • A minimalist lifestyle results in a smaller ecological footprint and greater wellbeing. • Outcomes varied across minimalism subgroups; with least benefit for aesthetic minimalism. • Two-thirds of participants were interested in adopting minimalism or were actively working on it. • These findings suggests that minimalism is an attractive path to reducing consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102618
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The environmental impact and wellbeing benefits of minimalism

Iain Walker, Zoe Leviston, Rebecca Blackburn
6 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Environmental Sustainability in Business
12.44
article

The environmental impact and wellbeing benefits of minimalism

Iain Walker, Zoe Leviston, Rebecca Blackburn
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Technological improvements alone will be insufficient to reduce carbon emissions to limit climate change; reducing consumption will also be necessary. Here we investigate minimalism, a low-consumption lifestyle which involves voluntarily reducing material consumption as a possible scalable pathway for consumption reduction. As minimalists aim to own few possessions, they might have a low carbon footprint, but this is yet to be established. This study investigates the environmental impact of minimalism, measured via an ecological footprint calculator in an online survey (N=444). We also investigate wellbeing (measured using life satisfaction and the PANAS), and its association with minimalism. We found that minimalism is negatively associated with ecological footprint and negative affect, positively associated with positive affect, but not associated with life satisfaction. In addition, we investigated subdimensions of minimalism (‘aesthetic’ minimalism, ‘few belongings’ minimalism, and ‘mindful’ minimalism). We found that higher levels of ‘few belongings’ minimalism and ‘mindful’ minimalism were related to a lower ecological footprint, positive affect, and greater environmental concern, while ‘aesthetic’ minimalism was not. ‘Few belongings’ minimalism was also associated with having a more energy efficient house, a smaller goods footprint, purchasing fewer clothes, smaller transport and food footprints, and producing less waste than the other types of minimalism. Our findings suggest that the adoption of minimalism as a low-consumption lifestyle has potential advantages for both the environment and wellbeing, though some facets of minimalism appear more promising than others. • A minimalist lifestyle results in a smaller ecological footprint and greater wellbeing. • Outcomes varied across minimalism subgroups; with least benefit for aesthetic minimalism. • Two-thirds of participants were interested in adopting minimalism or were actively working on it. • These findings suggests that minimalism is an attractive path to reducing consumption.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 104
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
12.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.