How can working conditions for online crowdworkers be improved? Institutional experiments for cross-jurisdictional polycentric work
This article articulates the theory and design of the Crowdsourcing Wage Pledge, an action research initiative exploring how academic users of paid crowdsourcing can contribute to improving the working conditions of online crowdworkers. ‘Crowdwork’ describes remote information work comprising short tasks – for example, surveys, transcription, translation, data cleaning – organized through online platforms (for example, Amazon Mechanical Turk, Clickworker, Scale API) and typically remunerated under a self-employed piecework model. The digital labour platforms mediating this work are important in a growing range of sectors, having become, for example, key nodes in the global supply chains for artificial intelligence products, including self-driving cars and chatbots (for example, ChatGPT). Academics also use crowdsourcing – social scientists, for example, to recruit study participants, and computer scientists to outsource data-cleaning work. While crowdwork creates new income opportunities with, sometimes, greater time flexibility and lower barriers to entry than traditional employment, crowdworkers typically earn less than traditional employees doing similar work, often below minimum wage, and face other decent work deficits, including arbitrary nonpayment and termination and misclassification. While some jurisdictions are developing laws to address these challenges, these typically focus on in-person platform work (for example, delivery). Crowdwork, however, is often cross-jurisdictional and therefore presents challenges for national regulation. The Crowdsourcing Wage Pledge is a voluntary regulatory initiative aiming to recruit academic users of crowdsourcing into adopting best practices identified by previous research. It is informed both by past practical efforts to improve crowdwork working conditions and by theory from political science, human-computer interaction, and industrial relations.
Authors
- Kelle Howson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-7993)
- Jamie Woodcock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-305X)
- M. Six Silberman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7693-8457)
- Hannah Johnston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5811-165X)
Institutions
- King's College London (GB)
- York University (CA)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Work in the Global Economy
- Published
- 2025-05-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1332/27324176y2025d000000037
- Primary Topic
- Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- H2020 European Research Council