Ghosts in the machine: algorithmic fascism and the psychopolitics of crisis

This article examines the emergence of ‘algorithmic fascism’ as a new form of social control operating through digital infrastructures in the context of global polycrisis. Drawing on Félix Guattari’s schizoanalytic framework, we argue that contemporary fascism thrives in a ‘grey zone’ where subjectivity is fractured into data points and monetised through algorithmic governance. Unlike historical fascism’s centralised propaganda, today’s digital authoritarianism operates through decentralised networks that blur distinctions between user agency and automated control. These systems engineer crisis by leveraging psychosocial fragmentation to normalise authoritarian desires. Through a psychosocial lens, we investigate how digital platforms reshape collective anxiety, erode democratic resistance and facilitate micro-fascist logics. We propose a ‘post-media praxis’ of tactical resistance that hijacks algorithmic systems to counter far-right movements and reclaim ambiguity as a site of struggle against algorithmic subjection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Studies
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/14786737y2025d000000042
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ghosts in the machine: algorithmic fascism and the psychopolitics of crisis

A.T. Kingsmith, Brett Zehner
2 citations
Journal of Psychosocial Studies
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
8.40
article

Ghosts in the machine: algorithmic fascism and the psychopolitics of crisis

A.T. Kingsmith, Brett Zehner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines the emergence of ‘algorithmic fascism’ as a new form of social control operating through digital infrastructures in the context of global polycrisis. Drawing on Félix Guattari’s schizoanalytic framework, we argue that contemporary fascism thrives in a ‘grey zone’ where subjectivity is fractured into data points and monetised through algorithmic governance. Unlike historical fascism’s centralised propaganda, today’s digital authoritarianism operates through decentralised networks that blur distinctions between user agency and automated control. These systems engineer crisis by leveraging psychosocial fragmentation to normalise authoritarian desires. Through a psychosocial lens, we investigate how digital platforms reshape collective anxiety, erode democratic resistance and facilitate micro-fascist logics. We propose a ‘post-media praxis’ of tactical resistance that hijacks algorithmic systems to counter far-right movements and reclaim ambiguity as a site of struggle against algorithmic subjection.

Journal of Psychosocial StudiesVol. 18(1)
University of Exeter (GB), Ontario College of Art and Design (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ghosts in the machine: algorithmic fascism and the psychopolitics of crisis — A.T. Kingsmith, Brett Zehner · Journal of Psychosocial Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS