The Animality of the Letter-Matter. Auto-hetero-affection as the defining characteristic of a deconstructive positive conception of materiality

In his Perjury and Pardon seminar Jacques Derrida outlines a positive conception of materiality. He does so while criticising Paul de Man’s textual conception of it. For Derrida, this is too linguistic, too formalist, and thus incapable of accounting for a bodily quality of matter. But Derrida also criticises a secure referentiality from before spoken language as is entailed by a pre-critical recourse to ordinary language. Between these two options, he seeks for a third definition of materiality, whose main characteristic is auto-deixis. In turn, this characteristic is formulated by Derrida as coincident with auto-hetero-affection, which, according to him, is the attribute that defines finite animality. The introductory part of the paper shows how this late definition is enrooted in Derrida’s early development of a grammatological project, which implied a critical consideration of the confluence of cybernetics, semiotics, and life sciences. The central part of the paper demonstrates how Derrida’s definition stems from a close reading of De Man’s texts. The last part analyses the meaning of this definition and develops its epistemological consequences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2025_81_1_0409
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Animality of the Letter-Matter. Auto-hetero-affection as the defining characteristic of a deconstructive positive conception of materiality

Giustino De Michele
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

The Animality of the Letter-Matter. Auto-hetero-affection as the defining characteristic of a deconstructive positive conception of materiality

Giustino De Michele
article en

Abstract

In his Perjury and Pardon seminar Jacques Derrida outlines a positive conception of materiality. He does so while criticising Paul de Man’s textual conception of it. For Derrida, this is too linguistic, too formalist, and thus incapable of accounting for a bodily quality of matter. But Derrida also criticises a secure referentiality from before spoken language as is entailed by a pre-critical recourse to ordinary language. Between these two options, he seeks for a third definition of materiality, whose main characteristic is auto-deixis. In turn, this characteristic is formulated by Derrida as coincident with auto-hetero-affection, which, according to him, is the attribute that defines finite animality. The introductory part of the paper shows how this late definition is enrooted in Derrida’s early development of a grammatological project, which implied a critical consideration of the confluence of cybernetics, semiotics, and life sciences. The central part of the paper demonstrates how Derrida’s definition stems from a close reading of De Man’s texts. The last part analyses the meaning of this definition and develops its epistemological consequences.

Revista Portuguesa de FilosofiaVol. 81(1-2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Animality of the Letter-Matter. Auto-hetero-affection as the defining characteristic of a deconstructive positive conception of materiality — Giustino De Michele · Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS