Jacques Derrida’s Faith in Democracy

This essay revisits Derrida’s Rogues in light of contemporary political developments, particularly the erosion of democratic norms in the United States. It explores Derrida’s notion of “democracy to come” and its intrinsic autoimmunity—the paradox whereby democracy preserves itself by limiting itself, even at the risk of its own destruction. Through sustained engagement with Derrida’s concepts of sovereignty, law, ipseity, and the event, the analysis argues that democracy’s openness to critique, transformation, and the unforeseeable future makes it both the most fragile and the most ethically compelling political form. Rather than affirming democracy as a fixed ideal, the essay emphasizes its constitutive indeterminacy and historicity. Concepts such as différance and khōra ground a philosophical faith in democracy—not as a realized system, but as a performative and ever-deferred promise of justice, beyond sovereignty and beyond salvation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2025_81_1_0439
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jacques Derrida’s Faith in Democracy

Michael Naas
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Jacques Derrida’s Faith in Democracy

Michael Naas
article en

Abstract

This essay revisits Derrida’s Rogues in light of contemporary political developments, particularly the erosion of democratic norms in the United States. It explores Derrida’s notion of “democracy to come” and its intrinsic autoimmunity—the paradox whereby democracy preserves itself by limiting itself, even at the risk of its own destruction. Through sustained engagement with Derrida’s concepts of sovereignty, law, ipseity, and the event, the analysis argues that democracy’s openness to critique, transformation, and the unforeseeable future makes it both the most fragile and the most ethically compelling political form. Rather than affirming democracy as a fixed ideal, the essay emphasizes its constitutive indeterminacy and historicity. Concepts such as différance and khōra ground a philosophical faith in democracy—not as a realized system, but as a performative and ever-deferred promise of justice, beyond sovereignty and beyond salvation.

Revista Portuguesa de FilosofiaVol. 81(1-2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.