Human health risk assessment of three smoke flavoring primary products

As part of a mandatory 10-year re-authorization process, the safety of three Smoke Flavoring Primary Products (SFPPs) was assessed based on EFSA's guidance. Data available for three SFPPs included OECD guideline studies for in vivo genotoxicity, reproductive/developmental screening, and subchronic toxicity. Genotoxicity potential of individual constituents (∼50/SFPP) was also evaluated using existing data identified systematically or via in silico methods as required by EFSA. No constituents were determined to pose a genotoxic risk under conditions of intended use. Whole mixture genotoxicity studies were negative at doses up to 7000 or 10,234 mg/kg-body weight/day in micronucleus and transgenic rodent assays, respectively, much higher than typical limit doses. Whole mixture reproductive/developmental screening and subchronic 90-day testing data were also negative. The lowest NOAELs were the highest doses tested in the subchronic studies (785-1367 mg/kg-body weight/day). Human exposure was conservatively assessed using multiple approaches; the most refined exposure estimates assuming typical SFPP use levels were derived using EFSA's DietEx model adjusted for market share (0.29-0.42 mg/kg-body weight/day). The resulting margins of safety (2000-4700) between the health benchmark and exposure estimates exceed EFSA's target of 300 for each SFPP, thus supporting continued use of these SFPPs as safe alternatives to conventional smoking of food.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2025.115490
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human health risk assessment of three smoke flavoring primary products

Candace Doepker, Allison Franzen, Daniele Wikoff, Chad M. Thompson et al.
4 citations
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
3.75
article

Human health risk assessment of three smoke flavoring primary products

Candace Doepker, Allison Franzen, Daniele Wikoff, Chad M. Thompson, Gregory P. Brorby
article en
4 citations

Abstract

As part of a mandatory 10-year re-authorization process, the safety of three Smoke Flavoring Primary Products (SFPPs) was assessed based on EFSA's guidance. Data available for three SFPPs included OECD guideline studies for in vivo genotoxicity, reproductive/developmental screening, and subchronic toxicity. Genotoxicity potential of individual constituents (∼50/SFPP) was also evaluated using existing data identified systematically or via in silico methods as required by EFSA. No constituents were determined to pose a genotoxic risk under conditions of intended use. Whole mixture genotoxicity studies were negative at doses up to 7000 or 10,234 mg/kg-body weight/day in micronucleus and transgenic rodent assays, respectively, much higher than typical limit doses. Whole mixture reproductive/developmental screening and subchronic 90-day testing data were also negative. The lowest NOAELs were the highest doses tested in the subchronic studies (785-1367 mg/kg-body weight/day). Human exposure was conservatively assessed using multiple approaches; the most refined exposure estimates assuming typical SFPP use levels were derived using EFSA's DietEx model adjusted for market share (0.29-0.42 mg/kg-body weight/day). The resulting margins of safety (2000-4700) between the health benchmark and exposure estimates exceed EFSA's target of 300 for each SFPP, thus supporting continued use of these SFPPs as safe alternatives to conventional smoking of food.

Food and Chemical ToxicologyVol. 202
BioStrategies (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
3.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.