Carbon transition risk and corporate loan securitization

We examine how banks manage carbon transition risk by selling loans given to polluting borrowers to less regulated shadow banks in securitization markets. Exploiting the election of Donald Trump as an exogenous shock that reduces carbon transition risk, we find that banks engage in regulatory arbitrage and use brown loan securitization to manage their exposure to carbon transition risk. Banks are more likely to securitize brown loans when carbon transition risk is high but keep these loans on their balance sheets when the risk is reduced. In addition, securitization enables banks to offer lower interest rates to polluting borrowers but does not affect the supply of green loans. Our findings are more pronounced among banks with low levels of capitalization, domestic banks, and banks that do not display green lending preferences. We discuss how securitization can weaken the effectiveness of bank climate policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Intermediation
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2025.101146
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon transition risk and corporate loan securitization

Huyen Nguyen, Isabella Mueller, Trang Nguyen
7 citations
Journal of Financial Intermediation
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
15.45
article

Carbon transition risk and corporate loan securitization

Huyen Nguyen, Isabella Mueller, Trang Nguyen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

We examine how banks manage carbon transition risk by selling loans given to polluting borrowers to less regulated shadow banks in securitization markets. Exploiting the election of Donald Trump as an exogenous shock that reduces carbon transition risk, we find that banks engage in regulatory arbitrage and use brown loan securitization to manage their exposure to carbon transition risk. Banks are more likely to securitize brown loans when carbon transition risk is high but keep these loans on their balance sheets when the risk is reduced. In addition, securitization enables banks to offer lower interest rates to polluting borrowers but does not affect the supply of green loans. Our findings are more pronounced among banks with low levels of capitalization, domestic banks, and banks that do not display green lending preferences. We discuss how securitization can weaken the effectiveness of bank climate policies.

Journal of Financial IntermediationVol. 63
Halle Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Bristol (GB), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
15.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon transition risk and corporate loan securitization — Huyen Nguyen, Isabella Mueller, et al. · Journal of Financial Intermediation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS