Reinvestigation of the bound coherent neutron scattering lengths of lithium and its isotopes using neutron Bragg powder diffraction and neutron interferometry

The quality of neutron scattering studies relies upon accurately determined bound coherent neutron scattering lengths<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>, whose standard tabulated values can be in need of review. We have measured integrated Bragg peak intensities via neutron diffraction from LiF powders, as well as scattering-length densities via neutron interferometry on LiF aqueous solutions, to accurately redetermine the<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values for the lithium isotopes<sup>6</sup>Li and<sup>7</sup>Li, as well as that for naturally occurring elemental Li as a mix of these two isotopes. As compared to earlier studies going back to 1986, our measurements make use of considerably improved instrumentation, and careful attention was given to the experimental procedure as well as to data analysis, in particular to aspects of systematic error. From the neutron diffraction measurements we obtain<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -1.94(2) fm, in excellent agreement with our interferometry results of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= 2.28(4) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -2.28(3) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -1.93(3) fm, allowing to average them together and to propose recommended values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>= -1.93(2) fm, where all values correspond to pure isotopes or the standard terrestrial isotopic composition of<sup>nat</sup>Li. Compared to standard literature values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= 2.0(1) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -2.22(2) fm, and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -1.90(3) fm, we note in particular that our recommended value for<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li) is 14% greater in magnitude, which is well outside of experimental uncertainties. Having obtained nearly identical results using two independent experimental techniques with qualitatively different possible sources of systematic error, we have confidence in our recommended<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values. We discuss reasons for the observed discrepancies with respect to previously tabulated values, as well as the relative merits of the various methods to measure bound coherent neutron scattering lengths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/add3a6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear Physics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reinvestigation of the bound coherent neutron scattering lengths of lithium and its isotopes using neutron Bragg powder diffraction and neutron interferometry

Henry E. Fischer, Hartmut Lemmel, Ralf Kautenburger, Kristina Brix et al.
1 citations
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Nuclear Physics and Applications
1.88
article

Reinvestigation of the bound coherent neutron scattering lengths of lithium and its isotopes using neutron Bragg powder diffraction and neutron interferometry

Henry E. Fischer, Hartmut Lemmel, Ralf Kautenburger, Kristina Brix, Thomas C. Hansen, Florian Gehlhaar, Vanessa K. Peterson, Holger Kohlmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The quality of neutron scattering studies relies upon accurately determined bound coherent neutron scattering lengths<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>, whose standard tabulated values can be in need of review. We have measured integrated Bragg peak intensities via neutron diffraction from LiF powders, as well as scattering-length densities via neutron interferometry on LiF aqueous solutions, to accurately redetermine the<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values for the lithium isotopes<sup>6</sup>Li and<sup>7</sup>Li, as well as that for naturally occurring elemental Li as a mix of these two isotopes. As compared to earlier studies going back to 1986, our measurements make use of considerably improved instrumentation, and careful attention was given to the experimental procedure as well as to data analysis, in particular to aspects of systematic error. From the neutron diffraction measurements we obtain<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -1.94(2) fm, in excellent agreement with our interferometry results of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= 2.28(4) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -2.28(3) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -1.93(3) fm, allowing to average them together and to propose recommended values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>= -1.93(2) fm, where all values correspond to pure isotopes or the standard terrestrial isotopic composition of<sup>nat</sup>Li. Compared to standard literature values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= 2.0(1) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -2.22(2) fm, and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -1.90(3) fm, we note in particular that our recommended value for<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li) is 14% greater in magnitude, which is well outside of experimental uncertainties. Having obtained nearly identical results using two independent experimental techniques with qualitatively different possible sources of systematic error, we have confidence in our recommended<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values. We discuss reasons for the observed discrepancies with respect to previously tabulated values, as well as the relative merits of the various methods to measure bound coherent neutron scattering lengths.

Journal of Physics Condensed MatterVol. 37(23)
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (AU), TU Wien (AT), Institut Laue-Langevin (FR), Saarland University (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Universität des Saarlandes
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Nuclear Physics and Applications
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.