The influence of a conservation‐based grazing program on greater sage‐grouse habitat selection

Abstract Understanding how vegetation management affects animals' habitat selection patterns is critical for comprehensive conservation planning. As part of a decade‐long study (2011–2019) of 486 adult female sage‐grouse in central Montana, we investigated how a conservation‐based grazing program (CGP) affected greater sage‐grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ) habitat selection at two temporal scales: (a) the seasonal scale (four biologically relevant seasons) and (b) the annual scale. We used resource selection functions to assess sage‐grouse selection for pastures enrolled in a CGP as well as plant functional type and topography. We found that sage‐grouse strongly selected shrub cover, flatter slopes, and less tree cover. They selected CGP‐enrolled pastures (Pre‐, During‐, and Post‐grazing system implementation) over Non‐CGP pastures during all seasons except the summer–fall. During the summer–fall, they selected pastures where CGP implementation was complete. Future research is needed to determine whether selection for CGP‐enrolled pastures was due to unmeasured, underlying differences between CGP and non‐CGP pastures or CGP enrollment patterns rather than effects of different grazing systems, as well as whether these habitat selection differences are linked to demographic rates or population dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70053
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of a conservation‐based grazing program on greater sage‐grouse habitat selection

Mark Szczypinski, Lorelle I. Berkeley, Shea P. Coons, Victoria J. Dreitz et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

The influence of a conservation‐based grazing program on greater sage‐grouse habitat selection

Mark Szczypinski, Lorelle I. Berkeley, Shea P. Coons, Victoria J. Dreitz, Elizabeth Simpson, Jennifer E. Helm
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding how vegetation management affects animals' habitat selection patterns is critical for comprehensive conservation planning. As part of a decade‐long study (2011–2019) of 486 adult female sage‐grouse in central Montana, we investigated how a conservation‐based grazing program (CGP) affected greater sage‐grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ) habitat selection at two temporal scales: (a) the seasonal scale (four biologically relevant seasons) and (b) the annual scale. We used resource selection functions to assess sage‐grouse selection for pastures enrolled in a CGP as well as plant functional type and topography. We found that sage‐grouse strongly selected shrub cover, flatter slopes, and less tree cover. They selected CGP‐enrolled pastures (Pre‐, During‐, and Post‐grazing system implementation) over Non‐CGP pastures during all seasons except the summer–fall. During the summer–fall, they selected pastures where CGP implementation was complete. Future research is needed to determine whether selection for CGP‐enrolled pastures was due to unmeasured, underlying differences between CGP and non‐CGP pastures or CGP enrollment patterns rather than effects of different grazing systems, as well as whether these habitat selection differences are linked to demographic rates or population dynamics.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(6)
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US), University of Montana (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Montana, Safari Club International Foundation, Intermountain West Joint Venture, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.