Optimal weights and priors in simultaneous fitting of multiple small-angle scattering datasets

Small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS and SANS) are powerful techniques in materials science and soft matter. This study addressed how multiple SAXS or SANS datasets are best weighted when performing simultaneous fitting. Three weighting schemes were tested: (1) equal weighting of all datapoints, (2) equal weighting of each dataset through normalization with the number of datapoints and (3) weighting proportional to the information content. The weighting schemes were assessed by model refinement against synthetic data under numerous conditions. The first weighting scheme led to the most accurate parameter estimation, especially when one dataset substantially outnumbered the other(s). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that inclusion of Gaussian priors significantly improves the accuracy of the refined parameters, as compared with common practice, where each parameter is constrained uniformly within an allowed interval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Crystallography
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600576725002390
Primary Topic
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal weights and priors in simultaneous fitting of multiple small-angle scattering datasets

Andreas Haahr Larsen
Journal of Applied Crystallography
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
article

Optimal weights and priors in simultaneous fitting of multiple small-angle scattering datasets

Andreas Haahr Larsen
article en

Abstract

Small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS and SANS) are powerful techniques in materials science and soft matter. This study addressed how multiple SAXS or SANS datasets are best weighted when performing simultaneous fitting. Three weighting schemes were tested: (1) equal weighting of all datapoints, (2) equal weighting of each dataset through normalization with the number of datapoints and (3) weighting proportional to the information content. The weighting schemes were assessed by model refinement against synthetic data under numerous conditions. The first weighting scheme led to the most accurate parameter estimation, especially when one dataset substantially outnumbered the other(s). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that inclusion of Gaussian priors significantly improves the accuracy of the refined parameters, as compared with common practice, where each parameter is constrained uniformly within an allowed interval.

Journal of Applied CrystallographyVol. 58(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Carlsbergfondet, Lundbeckfonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.