<scp>gofher</scp> – which side is closer? Automatically disambiguating the tilt of disc galaxies by measuring differential reddening

ABSTRACT As viewed from the Earth, most spiral galaxies are tilted – i.e. somewhere between edge-on and face-on – giving them an elliptical appearance. Although we can estimate the tilt by ‘de-projecting’ the ellipse back to a circle, the sign of the tilt remains ambiguous: we cannot easily determine which side of the tilted disc is closer to the Earth. In this paper, we introduce an automated method for determining which side of the disc is closer by measuring differential reddening. In particular, the side of the bulge that is behind the nearer side of the disc will suffer more dust-induced reddening than the side of the bulge that is not disc-obscured. While close manual inspection of the bulge by eye can sometimes reveal which side of the galaxy is more red, automating this process is fraught with pitfalls and potential selection effects, such as exactly how and where to split the galaxy in half. We present our method and test it against the recent ‘spin parity’ paper, which carefully determined the near side of over 500 galaxies. Our method achieves 95 per cent agreement with the confident human classifications, and 73 per cent agreement in the less confident cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf720
Primary Topic
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

gofher – which side is closer? Automatically disambiguating the tilt of disc galaxies by measuring differential reddening

Wayne B. Hayes, Cora A Schallock
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
article

gofher – which side is closer? Automatically disambiguating the tilt of disc galaxies by measuring differential reddening

Wayne B. Hayes, Cora A Schallock
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As viewed from the Earth, most spiral galaxies are tilted – i.e. somewhere between edge-on and face-on – giving them an elliptical appearance. Although we can estimate the tilt by ‘de-projecting’ the ellipse back to a circle, the sign of the tilt remains ambiguous: we cannot easily determine which side of the tilted disc is closer to the Earth. In this paper, we introduce an automated method for determining which side of the disc is closer by measuring differential reddening. In particular, the side of the bulge that is behind the nearer side of the disc will suffer more dust-induced reddening than the side of the bulge that is not disc-obscured. While close manual inspection of the bulge by eye can sometimes reveal which side of the galaxy is more red, automating this process is fraught with pitfalls and potential selection effects, such as exactly how and where to split the galaxy in half. We present our method and test it against the recent ‘spin parity’ paper, which carefully determined the near side of over 500 galaxies. Our method achieves 95 per cent agreement with the confident human classifications, and 73 per cent agreement in the less confident cases.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 540(1)
University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US)
National Science Foundation, Smithsonian Institution, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, Space Telescope Science Institute, Queen's University Belfast, Durham University, Queen's University, National Central University, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Science Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.