The rationales of managing public space: Changing values in a developing discipline

Public space managers are facing multiple transitions and increasingly complex challenges, prompting the emergence of new approaches that address diverse aims and involve a broader range of actors. As a result, the rationale behind management of public space is gradually changing. Gaining insight into the values that drive management of public space is essential. This research shows that, from the managers' perspective, the rationale behind management of public space is largely implicit, with a non-hierarchical relationship between means and ends. Where common approaches emphasised technical and economic values, a clear shift towards the integration of soft values, such as social inclusion and sustainability, is becoming apparent. This transition parallels historical paradigm shifts in spatial planning and underlines the dynamic nature of management of public space. This study examined the values pursued in the Netherlands based on a qualitative study consisting of narrative interviews and focus groups. The results offer insights into the values pursued and highlight the importance of an explicit and systematic approach, as well as research into the values that actually shape management of public space in current practice. • The quality of public spaces is largely determined by the values assigned to it by individual managers. • Management of public space increasingly embraces soft values, moving beyond purely the technical and economic nature. • Values of managing public space are applied in practice rather intuitively instead of systematically. • The ongoing shift of pursued values in management of public space seems to indicate a paradigm shift.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104078
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The rationales of managing public space: Changing values in a developing discipline

Eva Duivenvoorden, Ton Hesselmans, M. Brinkhuijsen, Thomas Hartmann
1 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
1.01
article

The rationales of managing public space: Changing values in a developing discipline

Eva Duivenvoorden, Ton Hesselmans, M. Brinkhuijsen, Thomas Hartmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Public space managers are facing multiple transitions and increasingly complex challenges, prompting the emergence of new approaches that address diverse aims and involve a broader range of actors. As a result, the rationale behind management of public space is gradually changing. Gaining insight into the values that drive management of public space is essential. This research shows that, from the managers' perspective, the rationale behind management of public space is largely implicit, with a non-hierarchical relationship between means and ends. Where common approaches emphasised technical and economic values, a clear shift towards the integration of soft values, such as social inclusion and sustainability, is becoming apparent. This transition parallels historical paradigm shifts in spatial planning and underlines the dynamic nature of management of public space. This study examined the values pursued in the Netherlands based on a qualitative study consisting of narrative interviews and focus groups. The results offer insights into the values pursued and highlight the importance of an explicit and systematic approach, as well as research into the values that actually shape management of public space in current practice. • The quality of public spaces is largely determined by the values assigned to it by individual managers. • Management of public space increasingly embraces soft values, moving beyond purely the technical and economic nature. • Values of managing public space are applied in practice rather intuitively instead of systematically. • The ongoing shift of pursued values in management of public space seems to indicate a paradigm shift.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 169
TU Dortmund University (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.