The Impact of Patient Age on Causes of Graft Loss After Renal Transplantation

The interplay of recipient age and graft loss causes is underexplored, despite its relevance for patient management and endpoint definition in clinical trials. This study aimed to investigate the impact of recipient age on graft loss causes. In this retrospective single-center cohort study with 1743 kidney transplantations between 1995 and 2022, graft losses were assigned to either death with graft function (DwGF) or graft failure (GF). Additionally, causes of death and GF were determined by reviewing all available clinical/histological information. Data were analyzed across recipient age groups (≤40, 41-60 and >60 years) and across three time periods (1995-2004, 2005-2014, 2015-2022). Among 816 graft losses, 56% were attributed to DwGF and 44% to GF. The proportion of DwGF increased stepwise with age (21% in young vs. 52% in middle-aged vs. 76% in elderly patients; p < 0.0001), with similar proportions across the three time periods. Rejection alone or in combination with other events caused GF in 76% of young, 51% of middle-aged, and 34% of elderly patients (p < 0.0001). Main death-causes were cardiovascular events (23%), infections (23%) and malignancies (23%). Graft loss causes are strongly age-related. This might have significant implications for clinical study design and patient management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplant International
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2025.14544
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Patient Age on Causes of Graft Loss After Renal Transplantation

Caroline Wehmeier, Michael Dickenmann, Andrea Fisler, Stefan Schaub et al.
2 citations
Transplant International
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
3.97
article

The Impact of Patient Age on Causes of Graft Loss After Renal Transplantation

Caroline Wehmeier, Michael Dickenmann, Andrea Fisler, Stefan Schaub, Christian Förster, Stefan Farese, Felix Burkhalter, Seraina von Moos, Min Jeong Kim, Susanne Winkler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The interplay of recipient age and graft loss causes is underexplored, despite its relevance for patient management and endpoint definition in clinical trials. This study aimed to investigate the impact of recipient age on graft loss causes. In this retrospective single-center cohort study with 1743 kidney transplantations between 1995 and 2022, graft losses were assigned to either death with graft function (DwGF) or graft failure (GF). Additionally, causes of death and GF were determined by reviewing all available clinical/histological information. Data were analyzed across recipient age groups (≤40, 41-60 and >60 years) and across three time periods (1995-2004, 2005-2014, 2015-2022). Among 816 graft losses, 56% were attributed to DwGF and 44% to GF. The proportion of DwGF increased stepwise with age (21% in young vs. 52% in middle-aged vs. 76% in elderly patients; p < 0.0001), with similar proportions across the three time periods. Rejection alone or in combination with other events caused GF in 76% of young, 51% of middle-aged, and 34% of elderly patients (p < 0.0001). Main death-causes were cardiovascular events (23%), infections (23%) and malignancies (23%). Graft loss causes are strongly age-related. This might have significant implications for clinical study design and patient management.

Transplant InternationalVol. 38
University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Kantonsspital Baselland (CH), Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH), Kantonsspital Aarau (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
3.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.