RESEARCH-AI: Communicating academic honesty: teacher messages and student perceptions about generative AI

Integrating generative AI (GenAI) in higher education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in maintaining academic integrity. This study explores faculty communication strategies when addressing suspected GenAI misuse, analyzing responses through Gallant’s rule-based and integrity-focused frameworks. Data from a survey reveal a dominant reliance on punitive, rule-based approaches, highlighting tensions between students and instructors. While some faculty adopt communicative and educational strategies, fostering trust and collaboration, others exhibit a dismissive stance due to perceived administrative burdens. The findings support the growing research that institutions prioritize educational interventions and support faculty in developing trust-based, proactive strategies for integrating GenAI responsibly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1544430
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESEARCH-AI: Communicating academic honesty: teacher messages and student perceptions about generative AI

Chuhao Wu, Sarah T. Zipf, Tiffany Petricini
3 citations
Frontiers in Communication
Academic integrity and plagiarism
7.10
article

RESEARCH-AI: Communicating academic honesty: teacher messages and student perceptions about generative AI

Chuhao Wu, Sarah T. Zipf, Tiffany Petricini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Integrating generative AI (GenAI) in higher education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in maintaining academic integrity. This study explores faculty communication strategies when addressing suspected GenAI misuse, analyzing responses through Gallant’s rule-based and integrity-focused frameworks. Data from a survey reveal a dominant reliance on punitive, rule-based approaches, highlighting tensions between students and instructors. While some faculty adopt communicative and educational strategies, fostering trust and collaboration, others exhibit a dismissive stance due to perceived administrative burdens. The findings support the growing research that institutions prioritize educational interventions and support faculty in developing trust-based, proactive strategies for integrating GenAI responsibly.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
Pennsylvania State University (US), Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RESEARCH-AI: Communicating academic honesty: teacher messages and student perceptions about generative AI — Chuhao Wu, Sarah T. Zipf, et al. · Frontiers in Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS