Evaluations of large language models in computational fluid dynamics: Leveraging, learning and creating knowledge

This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to leverage, learn and create knowledge in solving computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problems through three categories of baseline problems. These categories include (1) conventional CFD problems that can be solved using existing numerical methods in LLMs, such as lid-driven cavity flow and the Sod shock tube problem; (2) problems that require new numerical methods beyond those available in LLMs, such as the recently developed Chien-physics-informed neural networks for singularly perturbed convection–diffusion equations; and (3) problems that cannot be solved using existing numerical methods in LLMs, such as the ill-conditioned Hilbert linear algebraic systems. The evaluations indicate that reasoning LLMs overall outperform non-reasoning models in four test cases. Reasoning LLMs show excellent performance for CFD problems according to the tailored prompts, but their current capability in autonomous knowledge exploration and creation needs to be enhanced.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2025.100597
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluations of large language models in computational fluid dynamics: Leveraging, learning and creating knowledge

Guowei He, Lei Zhang, L. Wang
4 citations
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters
Topic Modeling
9.92
article

Evaluations of large language models in computational fluid dynamics: Leveraging, learning and creating knowledge

Guowei He, Lei Zhang, L. Wang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to leverage, learn and create knowledge in solving computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problems through three categories of baseline problems. These categories include (1) conventional CFD problems that can be solved using existing numerical methods in LLMs, such as lid-driven cavity flow and the Sod shock tube problem; (2) problems that require new numerical methods beyond those available in LLMs, such as the recently developed Chien-physics-informed neural networks for singularly perturbed convection–diffusion equations; and (3) problems that cannot be solved using existing numerical methods in LLMs, such as the ill-conditioned Hilbert linear algebraic systems. The evaluations indicate that reasoning LLMs overall outperform non-reasoning models in four test cases. Reasoning LLMs show excellent performance for CFD problems according to the tailored prompts, but their current capability in autonomous knowledge exploration and creation needs to be enhanced.

Theoretical and Applied Mechanics LettersVol. 15(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Topic Modeling
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluations of large language models in computational fluid dynamics: Leveraging, learning and creating knowledge — Guowei He, Lei Zhang, et al. · Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS