Digital morphometry illustrates a relationship between percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ in breast needle core biopsy and margin status at lumpectomy

Candidates for breast conserving surgery are selected based on imprecise variables and there is uncertainty surrounding the risk of complicated margins. Earlier estimates made with light microscopy revealed the correlation between percentage of needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ and positive lumpectomy margin status. We now study this association utilizing the precision of digital pathology. One hundred and seventy-nine lumpectomy specimens of pure ductal neoplasia were identified and their pathological, clinical, and radiological parameters retrieved. Each lumpectomy had a corresponding needle core biopsy for histological review. Virtually all cases exhibited a luminal A phenotype. Eighty-three cases showed positive margins and ninety-six cases, negative margins. We used the 2019 American College of Breast Surgeons Lumpectomy Consensus Guidelines to define margin status. For each case, by analog microscopy, we selected a single needle core biopsy slide with the greatest absolute quantity of carcinoma in-situ; each selected slide was submitted for digital whole slide imaging. Digital images were manually annotated for carcinoma in-situ, invasive carcinoma, stroma, and fat strictly based on morphology. Morphometric variables were compiled and compared to the corresponding lumpectomy margin status. Increases in percent ductal carcinoma in-situ are associated with greater odds of positive lumpectomy margins (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Above 10% carcinoma in-situ all but one case showed positive margins. This prediction was more precise compared to the association between pre-operative radiological studies and margin status, particularly in cases of pure ductal carcinoma in-situ. Our work suggests that needle core biopsy percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ maybe clinically useful in assessing the risk of a positive lumpectomy margin in select patients. A larger, multi-institutional study can further elucidate if pathological reporting of needle core biopsies with pure ductal breast neoplasia should include a percentage needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100445
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital morphometry illustrates a relationship between percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ in breast needle core biopsy and margin status at lumpectomy

Luis Samayoa, Stell Santiago, Alexander R. Gross, Gerald R. Hobbs
1 links
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Digital morphometry illustrates a relationship between percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ in breast needle core biopsy and margin status at lumpectomy

Luis Samayoa, Stell Santiago, Alexander R. Gross, Gerald R. Hobbs
article en

Abstract

Candidates for breast conserving surgery are selected based on imprecise variables and there is uncertainty surrounding the risk of complicated margins. Earlier estimates made with light microscopy revealed the correlation between percentage of needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ and positive lumpectomy margin status. We now study this association utilizing the precision of digital pathology. One hundred and seventy-nine lumpectomy specimens of pure ductal neoplasia were identified and their pathological, clinical, and radiological parameters retrieved. Each lumpectomy had a corresponding needle core biopsy for histological review. Virtually all cases exhibited a luminal A phenotype. Eighty-three cases showed positive margins and ninety-six cases, negative margins. We used the 2019 American College of Breast Surgeons Lumpectomy Consensus Guidelines to define margin status. For each case, by analog microscopy, we selected a single needle core biopsy slide with the greatest absolute quantity of carcinoma in-situ; each selected slide was submitted for digital whole slide imaging. Digital images were manually annotated for carcinoma in-situ, invasive carcinoma, stroma, and fat strictly based on morphology. Morphometric variables were compiled and compared to the corresponding lumpectomy margin status. Increases in percent ductal carcinoma in-situ are associated with greater odds of positive lumpectomy margins (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Above 10% carcinoma in-situ all but one case showed positive margins. This prediction was more precise compared to the association between pre-operative radiological studies and margin status, particularly in cases of pure ductal carcinoma in-situ. Our work suggests that needle core biopsy percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ maybe clinically useful in assessing the risk of a positive lumpectomy margin in select patients. A larger, multi-institutional study can further elucidate if pathological reporting of needle core biopsies with pure ductal breast neoplasia should include a percentage needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ.

Journal of Pathology InformaticsVol. 18
Norton Healthcare (US)
West Virginia University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.