Immunization Rejection as a Parental Right and Children's Right to Health in the Perspective of Health Law in Indonesia

Parental refusal of immunization for children creates a conflict between parental rights in caregiving and the child’s right to health, which is guaranteed by law. This research aims to analyze the conflict between these two rights within the framework of Indonesian health law and to explain the state's authority to protect children's health rights. This research uses a normative juridical method by analyzing legal regulations, scholarly literature, and legal principles concerning the best interests of the child. The results indicate that parental rights are relative and may be restricted if they endanger the child's health. The state has a constitutional obligation to ensure immunization as part of the child’s right to health. The best interests of the child principle form the legal basis for limiting parental rights, and refusal of immunization can be classified as neglect of the child’s rights. This study recommends strengthening immunization regulations, community education, and inter-institutional collaboration between health and legal sectors to ensure optimal protection of children's rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rechtsvinding
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i1.648
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunization Rejection as a Parental Right and Children's Right to Health in the Perspective of Health Law in Indonesia

Marsudi Dedi Putra, Repelita Witri
Rechtsvinding
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
article

Immunization Rejection as a Parental Right and Children's Right to Health in the Perspective of Health Law in Indonesia

Marsudi Dedi Putra, Repelita Witri
article en

Abstract

Parental refusal of immunization for children creates a conflict between parental rights in caregiving and the child’s right to health, which is guaranteed by law. This research aims to analyze the conflict between these two rights within the framework of Indonesian health law and to explain the state's authority to protect children's health rights. This research uses a normative juridical method by analyzing legal regulations, scholarly literature, and legal principles concerning the best interests of the child. The results indicate that parental rights are relative and may be restricted if they endanger the child's health. The state has a constitutional obligation to ensure immunization as part of the child’s right to health. The best interests of the child principle form the legal basis for limiting parental rights, and refusal of immunization can be classified as neglect of the child’s rights. This study recommends strengthening immunization regulations, community education, and inter-institutional collaboration between health and legal sectors to ensure optimal protection of children's rights.

RechtsvindingVol. 3(1)
Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.