Dominance of acetoclastic methanogenesis in municipal solid waste (MSW) decomposition despite high variability in microbial community composition: insights form natural stable carbon isotope and metagenomic analyses

Understanding the dynamics of microbial community and metabolic pathways involved in methanogenesis during municipal solid waste (MSW) decomposition is crucial for effective methane (CH 4 ) management in landfills. This study investigated bacterial and methanogenic community composition, methanogenic metabolism, and their dynamics across typical phases of MSW decomposition-anaerobic acid phase, accelerated methanogenic phase, and decelerated methanogenic phase. Parallel bioreactors (A and B) were analyzed using metagenomics and natural stable carbon isotope analyses. CH 4 production kinetics for both reactors were accurately simulated by the Gompertz kinetic model (R 2 ​> ​0.98), Capturing key MSW decomposition phases characterized by variations in CH 4 production, pH, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) concentrations. Concurrently, the methanogenic community transitioned from an initial dominance of acetoclastic methanogens Methanothrix in reactor A, and Methanothrix and Methanosarcina in reactor B to a co-dominance of hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanobacterium and acetoclastic methanogens Methanothrix and Methanosarcina in both reactors. Acetate concentration and CH 4 yield were identified as primary factors shaping methanogen community structure. Acetoclastic methanogenesis remained the predominant pathway, accounting for 66.5–85.9 ​% of total methanogenesis modules., This dominance was supported by stable carbon isotope (α c constantly below 1.055 in both reactors) and metagenomic analyses, particularly the prevalence of acetate-metabolizing genes such as acetate kinase and acetyl-CoA synthetase . Despite substantial variability in microbial community composition, acetoclastic methanogenesis consistently dominated CH 4 production throughout MSW decomposition. These findings enhance understanding of methanogenesis in MSW landfills, supporting strategies to mitigate CH 4 emissions and address climate goals. • Acetate and methane yield shaped methanogen community structure. • Methanothrix and Methanosarcina competed for acetate. • Acetoclastic methanogenesis exhibited a strong correlation with acetate availability. • Acetoclastic methanogenesis predominated throughout the MSW decomposition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eesus.2025.100018
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dominance of acetoclastic methanogenesis in municipal solid waste (MSW) decomposition despite high variability in microbial community composition: insights form natural stable carbon isotope and metagenomic analyses

Liyan Song, Weixi Shu, G.W. Price, Renjie Ni et al.
20 citations
Energy & Environmental Sustainability
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
20.13
article

Dominance of acetoclastic methanogenesis in municipal solid waste (MSW) decomposition despite high variability in microbial community composition: insights form natural stable carbon isotope and metagenomic analyses

Liyan Song, Weixi Shu, G.W. Price, Renjie Ni, Yang Shu, Albert Y. Sun, Xiaoxing Lin, Shuijing Wang
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of microbial community and metabolic pathways involved in methanogenesis during municipal solid waste (MSW) decomposition is crucial for effective methane (CH 4 ) management in landfills. This study investigated bacterial and methanogenic community composition, methanogenic metabolism, and their dynamics across typical phases of MSW decomposition-anaerobic acid phase, accelerated methanogenic phase, and decelerated methanogenic phase. Parallel bioreactors (A and B) were analyzed using metagenomics and natural stable carbon isotope analyses. CH 4 production kinetics for both reactors were accurately simulated by the Gompertz kinetic model (R 2 ​> ​0.98), Capturing key MSW decomposition phases characterized by variations in CH 4 production, pH, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) concentrations. Concurrently, the methanogenic community transitioned from an initial dominance of acetoclastic methanogens Methanothrix in reactor A, and Methanothrix and Methanosarcina in reactor B to a co-dominance of hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanobacterium and acetoclastic methanogens Methanothrix and Methanosarcina in both reactors. Acetate concentration and CH 4 yield were identified as primary factors shaping methanogen community structure. Acetoclastic methanogenesis remained the predominant pathway, accounting for 66.5–85.9 ​% of total methanogenesis modules., This dominance was supported by stable carbon isotope (α c constantly below 1.055 in both reactors) and metagenomic analyses, particularly the prevalence of acetate-metabolizing genes such as acetate kinase and acetyl-CoA synthetase . Despite substantial variability in microbial community composition, acetoclastic methanogenesis consistently dominated CH 4 production throughout MSW decomposition. These findings enhance understanding of methanogenesis in MSW landfills, supporting strategies to mitigate CH 4 emissions and address climate goals. • Acetate and methane yield shaped methanogen community structure. • Methanothrix and Methanosarcina competed for acetate. • Acetoclastic methanogenesis exhibited a strong correlation with acetate availability. • Acetoclastic methanogenesis predominated throughout the MSW decomposition.

Energy & Environmental SustainabilityVol. 1(2)
Tongji University (CN), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Dalhousie University (CA), Anhui University (CN), Westlake University (CN), Weifang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
20.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.