Real-life evaluation of the home vision monitoring application Odysight® in primary and secondary prevention of exudative maculopathies

To assess the performance of the Odysight® self-monitoring tool for primary and secondary prevention of exudative maculopathies. A one-year retrospective evaluation was conducted in a private practice. An alert was considered significant (SA) when patient was symptomatic, and non significant (NSA) when the patient was asymptomatic and the VA drop was refuted by an additional test carried out the next day. Of the 92 patients who received a prescription, 44 (48%) downloaded and used the application and were analyzed. At the end of the year, there were 24 (55.8%) active patients. 29 alerts were generated, 13 were considered as NSA, and no anticipated appointment was given. The remaining 16 alerts were SA, 6 (21%) of them were true positive, i.e, revelealed a disease activity on OCT, leading to anticipated injection (representing 9.3% of the patients). 83% of the true positive alerts were generated by eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Eleven false negative events occurred (6 (55%) for AMD, 4 (36%) for RVO, 1 (9%) for myopic MNV). No primary exudation occured, although 7 false positive alerts were generated. The overall sensitivity of alerts for detecting OCT recurrence was 35.3% (95% CI [12.6; 58]), specificity was 93% (95% CI [90.3; 95.8]), positive predictive value was 20.7% (95% CI [6; 35.7]), and negative predictive value was 96.5% (95% CI [94.5; 98.6]). Sensitivity was higher for RVO (55.6% (95% CI [26.7; 81.1]) than for AMD (14.3% (95% CI [2.6; 51.3]). In this real-life experimentation of Odysight, half of the patients used the application after initial prescription. Participation was low among diabetics. Odysight® allowed about 10% of the cohort to receive earlier intravitreal injection, albeit with a high number of false positives. Sensitivity was low in secondary prevention for AMD, and better for patients with RVO. Additional use in primary prevention may be questionable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JFO Open Ophthalmology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfop.2025.100166
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-life evaluation of the home vision monitoring application Odysight® in primary and secondary prevention of exudative maculopathies

Bénédicte Dupas, Pascale Massin, Laura Moyal, Mathieu Lehmann et al.
1 citations
JFO Open Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
1.71
article

Real-life evaluation of the home vision monitoring application Odysight® in primary and secondary prevention of exudative maculopathies

Bénédicte Dupas, Pascale Massin, Laura Moyal, Mathieu Lehmann, Auberie Bonjean
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To assess the performance of the Odysight® self-monitoring tool for primary and secondary prevention of exudative maculopathies. A one-year retrospective evaluation was conducted in a private practice. An alert was considered significant (SA) when patient was symptomatic, and non significant (NSA) when the patient was asymptomatic and the VA drop was refuted by an additional test carried out the next day. Of the 92 patients who received a prescription, 44 (48%) downloaded and used the application and were analyzed. At the end of the year, there were 24 (55.8%) active patients. 29 alerts were generated, 13 were considered as NSA, and no anticipated appointment was given. The remaining 16 alerts were SA, 6 (21%) of them were true positive, i.e, revelealed a disease activity on OCT, leading to anticipated injection (representing 9.3% of the patients). 83% of the true positive alerts were generated by eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Eleven false negative events occurred (6 (55%) for AMD, 4 (36%) for RVO, 1 (9%) for myopic MNV). No primary exudation occured, although 7 false positive alerts were generated. The overall sensitivity of alerts for detecting OCT recurrence was 35.3% (95% CI [12.6; 58]), specificity was 93% (95% CI [90.3; 95.8]), positive predictive value was 20.7% (95% CI [6; 35.7]), and negative predictive value was 96.5% (95% CI [94.5; 98.6]). Sensitivity was higher for RVO (55.6% (95% CI [26.7; 81.1]) than for AMD (14.3% (95% CI [2.6; 51.3]). In this real-life experimentation of Odysight, half of the patients used the application after initial prescription. Participation was low among diabetics. Odysight® allowed about 10% of the cohort to receive earlier intravitreal injection, albeit with a high number of false positives. Sensitivity was low in secondary prevention for AMD, and better for patients with RVO. Additional use in primary prevention may be questionable.

JFO Open OphthalmologyVol. 10
Université Paris Cité (FR), Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre Paul Broca (FR), Hôpital Broca (FR), Centre Ophtalmologique d'Imagerie et de Laser (FR), Hôpital Lariboisière (FR)
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.