SP04. Are Drains Necessary for Reduction Mammoplasty? Findings From an Updated Large Cohort Study

PURPOSE: The use of closed-suction drainage for reduction mammoplasty cases currently varies in practice depending on the plastic surgeon. Whereas previous studies have analyzed the rate of complications directly associated with drain use in reduction mammoplasty, we present the largest cohort of patients who received this care to re-evaluate the necessity of drain use. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty by a single surgeon from March 2015-February 2023. Patient demographics were collected from charts and summarized with descriptive statistics. Analysis was by breast, separated into those with closed-suction drains applied and those without. Breasts that had liposuction with the reduction or were missing data were excluded. Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables were used to assess for significant differences between the cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to analyze the association of drain usage with post-reduction complications. RESULTS: Of 1015 breasts, 48.1% had drains placed, while 51.9% did not. Usage of drains was a significant predictor of decreased rates of seroma (adjusted OR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.02 - 0.39, p = 0.001) and increased rates of infection (adjusted OR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.08 - 7.91, p = 0.040) with and without adjustment for demographic or intra- and postoperative characteristics. None of the seromas or infections in this study warranted surgical intervention. Out of breasts that received drains, postoperative days to drain removal (average = 6.35 days, range = 1-19) were not a significant predictor of complications, even after adjustment for patient demographics. CONCLUSION: This study found that the use of closed-suction drains in reduction mammoplasty was associated with a decrease in seroma rates, but at the cost of an increased risk of infection. Our data suggests that in select patients, the usage of drains may be indicated; however, they are not without disadvantages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001112772.62151.04
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP04. Are Drains Necessary for Reduction Mammoplasty? Findings From an Updated Large Cohort Study

Nikhil Sobti, Stephanie Francalancia, Mary Lou, Damon McIntire et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

SP04. Are Drains Necessary for Reduction Mammoplasty? Findings From an Updated Large Cohort Study

Nikhil Sobti, Stephanie Francalancia, Mary Lou, Damon McIntire, Rachel Sullivan, Kathryn Leeke
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of closed-suction drainage for reduction mammoplasty cases currently varies in practice depending on the plastic surgeon. Whereas previous studies have analyzed the rate of complications directly associated with drain use in reduction mammoplasty, we present the largest cohort of patients who received this care to re-evaluate the necessity of drain use. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty by a single surgeon from March 2015-February 2023. Patient demographics were collected from charts and summarized with descriptive statistics. Analysis was by breast, separated into those with closed-suction drains applied and those without. Breasts that had liposuction with the reduction or were missing data were excluded. Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables were used to assess for significant differences between the cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to analyze the association of drain usage with post-reduction complications. RESULTS: Of 1015 breasts, 48.1% had drains placed, while 51.9% did not. Usage of drains was a significant predictor of decreased rates of seroma (adjusted OR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.02 - 0.39, p = 0.001) and increased rates of infection (adjusted OR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.08 - 7.91, p = 0.040) with and without adjustment for demographic or intra- and postoperative characteristics. None of the seromas or infections in this study warranted surgical intervention. Out of breasts that received drains, postoperative days to drain removal (average = 6.35 days, range = 1-19) were not a significant predictor of complications, even after adjustment for patient demographics. CONCLUSION: This study found that the use of closed-suction drains in reduction mammoplasty was associated with a decrease in seroma rates, but at the cost of an increased risk of infection. Our data suggests that in select patients, the usage of drains may be indicated; however, they are not without disadvantages.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S1)
Brown University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.