C-87 | Outcomes of Bloodless Patients Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention- A Single Center Retrospective Review

Background: Mechanical circulatory support devices (MCS), including Impella and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), are commonly utilized in managing patients with Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMIC).However, their impact on mortality and clinical outcomes remains a topic of significant debate.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify patients diagnosed with AMIC who underwent Impella or IABP placement.Patients were stratified into two cohorts: AMIC with Impella and AMIC with IABP.Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to adjust for patient and hospital-level confounders, estimating odds ratios (ORs) for primary and secondary outcomes.The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest, cardiac tamponade, stroke, palliative consult (PC), respiratory failure (RF), acute kidney injury, post-procedural bleeding (PPB), length of stay, and total hospital charges.Results: Among 60,184 patients with AMIC, 11,599 underwent MCS with either Impella or IABP.Of these, 5,196 AMIC patients received Impella, and 6,403 AMIC received IABP.The mean age was comparable between groups (66.37 vs. 66.9 years), with males (72.6% vs. 69%) and whites (73.43% vs. 71.4%)predominating.The IABP group demonstrated higher rates of comorbidities, including dyslipidemia, prior MI, previous PCI, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.In-hospital mortality was observed in 3,735 patients.Multivariate analysis revealed that Impella use was associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.81-2.56,P0.0001), RF (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.69,P0.002), PPB (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.92-5.23,P0.000), and PC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09-1.89,P0.008).However, Impella was associated with a reduced risk of sepsis (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.99,P0.05).No significant differences were noted in other outcomes.Conclusions: In this large representative cohort of patients with AMIC, Impella use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and adverse events.These findings stress the importance of tailored decision-making in utilizing MCS devices in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103077
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C-87 | Outcomes of Bloodless Patients Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention- A Single Center Retrospective Review

Aron Schwarcz, Maria Casanova, Dipal Patel, Gabriel Alugba et al.
Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

C-87 | Outcomes of Bloodless Patients Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention- A Single Center Retrospective Review

Aron Schwarcz, Maria Casanova, Dipal Patel, Gabriel Alugba, Daniel Salcido, Karishma Narain, Zana Cort
article en

Abstract

Background: Mechanical circulatory support devices (MCS), including Impella and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), are commonly utilized in managing patients with Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMIC).However, their impact on mortality and clinical outcomes remains a topic of significant debate.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify patients diagnosed with AMIC who underwent Impella or IABP placement.Patients were stratified into two cohorts: AMIC with Impella and AMIC with IABP.Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to adjust for patient and hospital-level confounders, estimating odds ratios (ORs) for primary and secondary outcomes.The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest, cardiac tamponade, stroke, palliative consult (PC), respiratory failure (RF), acute kidney injury, post-procedural bleeding (PPB), length of stay, and total hospital charges.Results: Among 60,184 patients with AMIC, 11,599 underwent MCS with either Impella or IABP.Of these, 5,196 AMIC patients received Impella, and 6,403 AMIC received IABP.The mean age was comparable between groups (66.37 vs. 66.9 years), with males (72.6% vs. 69%) and whites (73.43% vs. 71.4%)predominating.The IABP group demonstrated higher rates of comorbidities, including dyslipidemia, prior MI, previous PCI, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.In-hospital mortality was observed in 3,735 patients.Multivariate analysis revealed that Impella use was associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.81-2.56,P0.0001), RF (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.69,P0.002), PPB (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.92-5.23,P0.000), and PC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09-1.89,P0.008).However, Impella was associated with a reduced risk of sepsis (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.99,P0.05).No significant differences were noted in other outcomes.Conclusions: In this large representative cohort of patients with AMIC, Impella use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and adverse events.These findings stress the importance of tailored decision-making in utilizing MCS devices in this high-risk population.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsVol. 4(5)
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center (US), Georgetown Hospital (CA), Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.