64. Revisiting Breast Implant Surveillance: Evaluating the Five-Year MRI Screening Guideline

PURPOSE: In 2020, the FDA updated its surveillance recommendations for breast implant rupture to an ultrasound or MRI 5 to 6 years following silicone implant placement, with repeat screening every 2 to 3 years after. As new generations of silicone gel implants are continuously developed, the definitive lifespan of an implant is unknown. Furthermore, iatrogenic damage and trauma can lead to implant rupture. This study aims to assess the risk of implant rupture in a single-surgeon cohort and evaluate the utility of routine surveillance MRIs in accurately diagnosing implant rupture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction for breast cancer with a single surgeon between 2012-2017. Inclusion criteria included implant-based reconstruction and a minimum follow-up period of five years. Clinical notes and imaging records were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed to elucidate implant rupture rate and bivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with rupture. RESULTS: A total of 376 patients underwent breast reconstruction with implants. 13% of reconstructions were with saline implants and 87% with silicone implants. 105 (28%) patients underwent at least one routine screening MRI to assess implant integrity. Implant rupture occurred in 26 patients, with an overall rupture rate of 7%. The average time from implant placement to rupture was 5.9 ± 4.0 years, with patients being 55 years old, on average, when diagnosed with implant rupture. 58% of all ruptures were diagnosed by routine MRI screening, and 4% were diagnosed incidentally on chest CT. 38% of all silicone implant ruptures presented without any clinical symptoms and were found incidentally on routine MRI screening, while all saline implant ruptures presented with clinical symptoms. 81% of all ruptures were identified as intracapsular on imaging and 12% were classified as extracapsular. 73% of ruptures were confirmed intraoperatively while patients underwent implant replacement. All patients with saline implants opted for new saline implants and 88% of patients with silicone implants opted for new silicone implants. 23% of all patients with breast implant rupture elected for implant removal, without replacement. The median time for implant removal or replacement after rupture was 3 months (average of 4.8 months) and ranged from 0.5-21 months. CONCLUSION: Implant rupture occurs on average 5.9 years after placement. Many patients with implant rupture may not present with clinical symptoms, and the true rate at which patients undergo routine MRI screening is low. Routine screening every 5 years is accurate in detecting implant rupture. Patients should be counseled on the risk of implant rupture and the potential for additional operations for implant replacement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001112208.24312.51
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

64. Revisiting Breast Implant Surveillance: Evaluating the Five-Year MRI Screening Guideline

Vanessa Mroueh, Meeti Mehta, Carolyn De La Cruz, Casey Zhang et al.
1 citations
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
article

64. Revisiting Breast Implant Surveillance: Evaluating the Five-Year MRI Screening Guideline

Vanessa Mroueh, Meeti Mehta, Carolyn De La Cruz, Casey Zhang, Shayan M. Sarrami, Andreea Gavrilescu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 2020, the FDA updated its surveillance recommendations for breast implant rupture to an ultrasound or MRI 5 to 6 years following silicone implant placement, with repeat screening every 2 to 3 years after. As new generations of silicone gel implants are continuously developed, the definitive lifespan of an implant is unknown. Furthermore, iatrogenic damage and trauma can lead to implant rupture. This study aims to assess the risk of implant rupture in a single-surgeon cohort and evaluate the utility of routine surveillance MRIs in accurately diagnosing implant rupture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction for breast cancer with a single surgeon between 2012-2017. Inclusion criteria included implant-based reconstruction and a minimum follow-up period of five years. Clinical notes and imaging records were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed to elucidate implant rupture rate and bivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with rupture. RESULTS: A total of 376 patients underwent breast reconstruction with implants. 13% of reconstructions were with saline implants and 87% with silicone implants. 105 (28%) patients underwent at least one routine screening MRI to assess implant integrity. Implant rupture occurred in 26 patients, with an overall rupture rate of 7%. The average time from implant placement to rupture was 5.9 ± 4.0 years, with patients being 55 years old, on average, when diagnosed with implant rupture. 58% of all ruptures were diagnosed by routine MRI screening, and 4% were diagnosed incidentally on chest CT. 38% of all silicone implant ruptures presented without any clinical symptoms and were found incidentally on routine MRI screening, while all saline implant ruptures presented with clinical symptoms. 81% of all ruptures were identified as intracapsular on imaging and 12% were classified as extracapsular. 73% of ruptures were confirmed intraoperatively while patients underwent implant replacement. All patients with saline implants opted for new saline implants and 88% of patients with silicone implants opted for new silicone implants. 23% of all patients with breast implant rupture elected for implant removal, without replacement. The median time for implant removal or replacement after rupture was 3 months (average of 4.8 months) and ranged from 0.5-21 months. CONCLUSION: Implant rupture occurs on average 5.9 years after placement. Many patients with implant rupture may not present with clinical symptoms, and the true rate at which patients undergo routine MRI screening is low. Routine screening every 5 years is accurate in detecting implant rupture. Patients should be counseled on the risk of implant rupture and the potential for additional operations for implant replacement.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S1)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.