Comparative Analysis of Oral Microbiota in Caries and Periodontal Disease Using Cultivation and Mass Spectrometry

Abstract Aim: The classical microbiological approach does not always allow for accurate strain identification. The study aims to determine the microflora of patients with caries, its complications, and periodontal pathologies in two ways: cultivation and mass spectrometry. Methods: Swabs from the tooth cavity and gingival junction were inoculated onto selective media, and low molecular weight species-specific fatty acids were isolated from blood samples, followed by chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry. Microbial species were identified as 12 in Group II and 9 in Group I. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test for categorical data, Mann–Whitney U test for colony-forming units (CFU)/mL comparisons, and Kruskal–Wallis test for multi-group comparisons. A P value of <0.05 and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess significance. Results: Traditional cultivation identified 12 microbial species in the periodontal group (Group II) and nine in the caries group (Group I), with Streptococcus viridans (77%) being the most frequently observed. Other strains, including Streptococcus pyogenes (20%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (16%), and Saccharomyces sp. (14%), exceeded the permissible titer of 10 4 CFU/mL in several cases. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-MS) demonstrated superior sensitivity, identifying 56 microbial strains, 13 of which exceeded the permissible titer. Notable findings included elevated titers of S. epidermidis , E. lenta , and Kingella sp. across both groups. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in microbial diversity and abundance between groups ( P ≤ 0.05), with subgroup analyses highlighting associations between microbial patterns and disease severity. These observations underscore the critical advantage of HPLC-MS in detecting low-abundance or fastidious microorganisms, providing deeper insights into microbial composition and potential strain-specific virulence factors. Conclusion: The results obtained can aid in selecting the appropriate antibiotic class when needed. Mass spectrometry demonstrated clear advantages over traditional methods, including higher sensitivity, accuracy, and the ability to detect a greater number of strains exceeding permissible titers. These findings are valuable for improving diagnostics and personalizing treatment for patients with caries and periodontal diseases, establishing mass spectrometry as a promising tool in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of international oral health
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_207_24
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Oral Microbiota in Caries and Periodontal Disease Using Cultivation and Mass Spectrometry

A.B. Mamytova, Г.К. Садыбакасова, Andrei Tsoi, Aida Bektasheva et al.
Journal of international oral health
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Comparative Analysis of Oral Microbiota in Caries and Periodontal Disease Using Cultivation and Mass Spectrometry

A.B. Mamytova, Г.К. Садыбакасова, Andrei Tsoi, Aida Bektasheva, Tamara Izaeva
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The classical microbiological approach does not always allow for accurate strain identification. The study aims to determine the microflora of patients with caries, its complications, and periodontal pathologies in two ways: cultivation and mass spectrometry. Methods: Swabs from the tooth cavity and gingival junction were inoculated onto selective media, and low molecular weight species-specific fatty acids were isolated from blood samples, followed by chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry. Microbial species were identified as 12 in Group II and 9 in Group I. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test for categorical data, Mann–Whitney U test for colony-forming units (CFU)/mL comparisons, and Kruskal–Wallis test for multi-group comparisons. A P value of <0.05 and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess significance. Results: Traditional cultivation identified 12 microbial species in the periodontal group (Group II) and nine in the caries group (Group I), with Streptococcus viridans (77%) being the most frequently observed. Other strains, including Streptococcus pyogenes (20%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (16%), and Saccharomyces sp. (14%), exceeded the permissible titer of 10 4 CFU/mL in several cases. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-MS) demonstrated superior sensitivity, identifying 56 microbial strains, 13 of which exceeded the permissible titer. Notable findings included elevated titers of S. epidermidis , E. lenta , and Kingella sp. across both groups. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in microbial diversity and abundance between groups ( P ≤ 0.05), with subgroup analyses highlighting associations between microbial patterns and disease severity. These observations underscore the critical advantage of HPLC-MS in detecting low-abundance or fastidious microorganisms, providing deeper insights into microbial composition and potential strain-specific virulence factors. Conclusion: The results obtained can aid in selecting the appropriate antibiotic class when needed. Mass spectrometry demonstrated clear advantages over traditional methods, including higher sensitivity, accuracy, and the ability to detect a greater number of strains exceeding permissible titers. These findings are valuable for improving diagnostics and personalizing treatment for patients with caries and periodontal diseases, establishing mass spectrometry as a promising tool in clinical practice.

Journal of international oral healthVol. 17(2)
Kyrgyz State Medical Academy (KG), Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University named after B.N. Yeltsin (KG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.