D-61 | Impact of Vascular Access Site (Radial vs. Femoral) on Post-PCI Morbidity, Mortality and Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis
Radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now preferred over the femoral route due to fewer vascular complications and improved patient outcomes. It offers reduced hospital costs, fewer complications, and faster recovery. However, challenges may necessitate the use of the femoral route. This study examines the association between vascular access sites and mortality and clinical outcomes in PCI patients.
Authors
- Ahmad Rayes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9740)
- Ankit Hanmandlu
- Mohamad Hasan Jawadi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2786-6875)
- Nouraldeen Manasrah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-368X)
- Amir Behzad Bagheri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1015-329X)
- Yasaman Navari
- Aveen Salar
- Mohammad Akkawi
- Anisha R. Pareddy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-126X)
- Yasemin Bahar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4786-8088)
- Vaishnavi Sirekulam
- Chmsalddin Alkhas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4623-7214)
- George G. Kidess (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8833-8772)
- Rohit Goru
- Bourann Husainy
- M Chadi Alraies
- Abha Kaddah
- Abubakr Ziaullah
- Mohammad Hamza
- Ishaq Khoury
- Zubi Danish
- Bassam Al Haly
Institutions
- Troy University (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Detroit Medical Center (US)
- Harper University Hospital (US)
- Augusta University Health (US)
- Guthrie Foundation (US)
- Medical Insurance Group Australia (AU)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Plymouth State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103193
- Primary Topic
- Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00