Evaluating User Interactions and Adoption Patterns of Generative AI in Health Care Occupations Using Claude: Cross-Sectional Study

GenAI tools are being adopted for a measurable subset of health care-related tasks, with usage concentrated in specific, often patient-facing roles. The critical limitation of user anonymity prevents definitive conclusions regarding whether usage primarily reflects patient information-seeking behavior (potentially driven by access needs) or professional workflow assistance. This ambiguity necessitates caution when interpreting current GenAI adoption. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for strategies addressing potential impacts on clinical workflows, patient decision-making, information quality, and health equity. Future research must aim to differentiate user types, while stakeholders should develop targeted guidance for both safe patient use and responsible professional integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/73918
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating User Interactions and Adoption Patterns of Generative AI in Health Care Occupations Using Claude: Cross-Sectional Study

Carmen E. Quatman, Gabriel Alain, James P. Crick, Catherine Quatman‐Yates et al.
3 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Evaluating User Interactions and Adoption Patterns of Generative AI in Health Care Occupations Using Claude: Cross-Sectional Study

Carmen E. Quatman, Gabriel Alain, James P. Crick, Catherine Quatman‐Yates, Ella Snead
article en
3 citations

Abstract

GenAI tools are being adopted for a measurable subset of health care-related tasks, with usage concentrated in specific, often patient-facing roles. The critical limitation of user anonymity prevents definitive conclusions regarding whether usage primarily reflects patient information-seeking behavior (potentially driven by access needs) or professional workflow assistance. This ambiguity necessitates caution when interpreting current GenAI adoption. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for strategies addressing potential impacts on clinical workflows, patient decision-making, information quality, and health equity. Future research must aim to differentiate user types, while stakeholders should develop targeted guidance for both safe patient use and responsible professional integration.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating User Interactions and Adoption Patterns of Generative AI in Health Care Occupations Using Claude: Cross-Sectional Study — Carmen E. Quatman, Gabriel Alain, et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS