Evaluating User Interactions and Adoption Patterns of Generative AI in Health Care Occupations Using Claude: Cross-Sectional Study
GenAI tools are being adopted for a measurable subset of health care-related tasks, with usage concentrated in specific, often patient-facing roles. The critical limitation of user anonymity prevents definitive conclusions regarding whether usage primarily reflects patient information-seeking behavior (potentially driven by access needs) or professional workflow assistance. This ambiguity necessitates caution when interpreting current GenAI adoption. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for strategies addressing potential impacts on clinical workflows, patient decision-making, information quality, and health equity. Future research must aim to differentiate user types, while stakeholders should develop targeted guidance for both safe patient use and responsible professional integration.
Authors
- Carmen E. Quatman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-7953)
- Gabriel Alain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-6897)
- James P. Crick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0019-1471)
- Catherine Quatman‐Yates (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-6062)
- Ella Snead (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3842-1414)
Institutions
- The Ohio State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/73918
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.96