ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL PLANNING MODELS OF THE WINTER OLYMPICS WITHIN THE REGION

This article explores the evolution of spatial and planning models for the Winter Olympics from 2002 to 2030 within the framework of regional development. Key elements of Olympic agglomerations are analyzed, including their structural components, length, direction of development and integration of natural and urban landscapes. The study identifies a clear transition in planning strategies between two distinct periods: 2002–2018 and 2022–2030. In the earlier period, Winter Olympics were characterized by compact, unidirectional spatial models with limited regional outreach, focusing heavily on constructing new infrastructure within confined zones.These models prioritized the immediate needs of the event, often neglecting broader regional development or post-event legacy. In contrast, the 2022–2030 period demonstrates a shift toward networked, multidirectional, and complex agglomerations. This evolution reflects not only advancements in planning and infrastructure technologies but also growing awareness of sustainability challenges and economic constraints. These models extend the geographic scale of Olympic agglomerations, incorporating multiple urban and rural clusters connected by enhanced transport and logistics networks. Importantly, they emphasize the reuse and adaptation of existing infrastructure to reduce costs and environmental impact while ensuring alignment with long-term regional development goals.The analysis also highlights the influence of external factors, such as climate change, economic instability, and public pressure for resource efficiency, on the transformation of spatial planning approaches. For instance, increasing variability in snow and temperature conditions has necessitated the selection of geographically dispersed venues with reliable climatic conditions, even if they are distant from the central Olympic city. This has led to a significant expansion in the radius of Olympic agglomerations, necessitating greater investment in transportation and communication infrastructure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Spatial development
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2024.10.106-116
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL PLANNING MODELS OF THE WINTER OLYMPICS WITHIN THE REGION

Volodymyr Kovpak
Spatial development
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL PLANNING MODELS OF THE WINTER OLYMPICS WITHIN THE REGION

Volodymyr Kovpak
article en

Abstract

This article explores the evolution of spatial and planning models for the Winter Olympics from 2002 to 2030 within the framework of regional development. Key elements of Olympic agglomerations are analyzed, including their structural components, length, direction of development and integration of natural and urban landscapes. The study identifies a clear transition in planning strategies between two distinct periods: 2002–2018 and 2022–2030. In the earlier period, Winter Olympics were characterized by compact, unidirectional spatial models with limited regional outreach, focusing heavily on constructing new infrastructure within confined zones.These models prioritized the immediate needs of the event, often neglecting broader regional development or post-event legacy. In contrast, the 2022–2030 period demonstrates a shift toward networked, multidirectional, and complex agglomerations. This evolution reflects not only advancements in planning and infrastructure technologies but also growing awareness of sustainability challenges and economic constraints. These models extend the geographic scale of Olympic agglomerations, incorporating multiple urban and rural clusters connected by enhanced transport and logistics networks. Importantly, they emphasize the reuse and adaptation of existing infrastructure to reduce costs and environmental impact while ensuring alignment with long-term regional development goals.The analysis also highlights the influence of external factors, such as climate change, economic instability, and public pressure for resource efficiency, on the transformation of spatial planning approaches. For instance, increasing variability in snow and temperature conditions has necessitated the selection of geographically dispersed venues with reliable climatic conditions, even if they are distant from the central Olympic city. This has led to a significant expansion in the radius of Olympic agglomerations, necessitating greater investment in transportation and communication infrastructure.

Spatial development(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.