Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment

Compared to women attending screening, the risk of breast cancer death was approximately two times greater in women not attending screening. This increased risk was independent of screening effects. Most observational studies have overestimated the effectiveness of screening mammography because they used <i>Dr</i> quantities that were too small to correct for self-selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Epidemiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s515464
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment

Philippe Autier
2 citations
Clinical Epidemiology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
2.09
article

Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment

Philippe Autier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Compared to women attending screening, the risk of breast cancer death was approximately two times greater in women not attending screening. This increased risk was independent of screening effects. Most observational studies have overestimated the effectiveness of screening mammography because they used <i>Dr</i> quantities that were too small to correct for self-selection.

Clinical EpidemiologyVol. Volume 17
International Prevention Research Institute (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment — Philippe Autier · Clinical Epidemiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS