Size and Thickness Effects on the Ductile Fracture Toughness of a 316 L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel in As‐Received and Aged Conditions

ABSTRACT Measuring ductile fracture toughness for materials requires the specimen size to be large enough for the tests to be valid. The presented work investigates the size related fracture behavior of as‐received and aged 316 L(N) stainless steel through an experimental approach. It focuses on the effects of the thickness and size of the specimens on the evaluated toughness. Compact tension (CT) specimens (thicknesses from 4 to 50 mm) and double edge notched tensile (DENT) specimens (thicknesses from 2 to 5 mm) were used. At as‐received state, CT tests lead to a nonmonotonic evolution of fracture toughness with a maximum at a critical thickness. At aged state, there is no significant thickness effect as all tests are valid. The essential work of fracture measured with DENT specimens appears to be equivalent to and consequently extends the nonmonotonic evolution of the fracture toughness at small thicknesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.14665
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Size and Thickness Effects on the Ductile Fracture Toughness of a 316 L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel in As‐Received and Aged Conditions

Yazid Madi, Jacques Besson, Bernard Marini, J. Garnier et al.
1 citations
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
0.71
article

Size and Thickness Effects on the Ductile Fracture Toughness of a 316 L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel in As‐Received and Aged Conditions

Yazid Madi, Jacques Besson, Bernard Marini, J. Garnier, Sihan Cheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measuring ductile fracture toughness for materials requires the specimen size to be large enough for the tests to be valid. The presented work investigates the size related fracture behavior of as‐received and aged 316 L(N) stainless steel through an experimental approach. It focuses on the effects of the thickness and size of the specimens on the evaluated toughness. Compact tension (CT) specimens (thicknesses from 4 to 50 mm) and double edge notched tensile (DENT) specimens (thicknesses from 2 to 5 mm) were used. At as‐received state, CT tests lead to a nonmonotonic evolution of fracture toughness with a maximum at a critical thickness. At aged state, there is no significant thickness effect as all tests are valid. The essential work of fracture measured with DENT specimens appears to be equivalent to and consequently extends the nonmonotonic evolution of the fracture toughness at small thicknesses.

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & StructuresVol. 48(7)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre des Matériaux (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR)
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Size and Thickness Effects on the Ductile Fracture Toughness of a 316 L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel in As‐Received and Aged Conditions — Yazid Madi, Jacques Besson, et al. · Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS