Comparative investigation of enhanced compressive mechanical properties of the three auxetic composites

Abstract Filling specific materials into auxetic frameworks exhibit significant potential for enhancing mechanical properties, without change of material’s size and configuration. However, the underlying reinforcement mechanisms need comprehensive exploration and comparison for various auxetic frameworks. In this study, three typical auxetic composites with identical auxetic porosity are designed, including the filled reentrant structure (FR), the filled peanut-shaped-hole-based structure (FP), and the filled elliptical-hole-based structure (FEH). Silicone rubber is used as the filling material. By combining compressive testing and finite element analysis, the compressive behavior of these three auxetic composites is systematically evaluated, revealing substantial improvements in stiffness, strength and energy absorption (EA). It is found that all composites exhibit enhanced mechanical properties, which surpass the combined effects of the individual material phases, thanks to the interaction between the auxetic framework and the soft filler material. More importantly, the FP performs best compared to the FR and FEH. Specifically, at 0.3 compressive strain, the Young’s modulus of the FP is 1.5 and 2.5 times that of the FR and FEH, respectively. The first peak stress of the FP increases by approximately 72% and 121%, compared to the FEH and FR, respectively. Furthermore, the FP exhibits the longest auxetic behavior, the best EA capacity and the highest buckling resistance during compression. Finally, the effects of the main geometrical parameters of the FP on its mechanical properties are investigated. Specifically, at 70% auxetic porosity, the stiffness and EA can respectively increase by 0.43 and 1.28 times, compared to 20% auxetic porosity. These findings facilitate the design and application of the auxetic composites, especially FP, in future developments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Materials and Structures
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/add2b3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative investigation of enhanced compressive mechanical properties of the three auxetic composites

Yumeng Guan, Hui Wang
1 citations
Smart Materials and Structures
Cellular and Composite Structures
0.71
article

Comparative investigation of enhanced compressive mechanical properties of the three auxetic composites

Yumeng Guan, Hui Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Filling specific materials into auxetic frameworks exhibit significant potential for enhancing mechanical properties, without change of material’s size and configuration. However, the underlying reinforcement mechanisms need comprehensive exploration and comparison for various auxetic frameworks. In this study, three typical auxetic composites with identical auxetic porosity are designed, including the filled reentrant structure (FR), the filled peanut-shaped-hole-based structure (FP), and the filled elliptical-hole-based structure (FEH). Silicone rubber is used as the filling material. By combining compressive testing and finite element analysis, the compressive behavior of these three auxetic composites is systematically evaluated, revealing substantial improvements in stiffness, strength and energy absorption (EA). It is found that all composites exhibit enhanced mechanical properties, which surpass the combined effects of the individual material phases, thanks to the interaction between the auxetic framework and the soft filler material. More importantly, the FP performs best compared to the FR and FEH. Specifically, at 0.3 compressive strain, the Young’s modulus of the FP is 1.5 and 2.5 times that of the FR and FEH, respectively. The first peak stress of the FP increases by approximately 72% and 121%, compared to the FEH and FR, respectively. Furthermore, the FP exhibits the longest auxetic behavior, the best EA capacity and the highest buckling resistance during compression. Finally, the effects of the main geometrical parameters of the FP on its mechanical properties are investigated. Specifically, at 70% auxetic porosity, the stiffness and EA can respectively increase by 0.43 and 1.28 times, compared to 20% auxetic porosity. These findings facilitate the design and application of the auxetic composites, especially FP, in future developments.

Smart Materials and StructuresVol. 34(5)
Hainan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cellular and Composite Structures
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.