Improving without transforming? The foregrounding of (un)sustainable values in sustainable consumption policy discourse

In this article, we explore the transition discourses and values expressed and foregrounded in Swedish national policy documents on sustainable consumption. Values, as material-discursive practices, shape the pace and direction of transitions, and for deep, system-wide sustainability transformations, it is critical to strengthen intrinsic, sustainability-aligned values. Public policy is especially well-positioned in this regard since policy shapes the discourse as well as the space for action. Our findings, however, reveal how market connotations frame Swedish sustainable consumption policy within a growth logic, where the public is to facilitate the market by removing barriers for the consumer while encouraging business innovation. As such, the Swedish policy discourse essentially reproduces a so-called improve discourse on sustainable consumption and reinforces extrinsic values of power and achievement. The scope of sustainable consumption is occasionally expanded, particularly in alignment with a shift discourse that emphasizes the move toward a circular economy. However, despite elements of benevolence and universalism in the overarching framing of the Generational Goal, these efforts remain overshadowed and co-opted by the extrinsically focused dominant market framing. Thus, we find limited potential for the policy discourse to help foreground more diverse values essential for deep transformations. Acknowledging the challenges of disentangling values in written policy documents, we call for future research to explore value tensions in practical policy-implementation contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2497136
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving without transforming? The foregrounding of (un)sustainable values in sustainable consumption policy discourse

Pernilla Hagbert, Hanna Eggestrand Vaughan
2 citations
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Environmental Education and Sustainability
4.84
article

Improving without transforming? The foregrounding of (un)sustainable values in sustainable consumption policy discourse

Pernilla Hagbert, Hanna Eggestrand Vaughan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this article, we explore the transition discourses and values expressed and foregrounded in Swedish national policy documents on sustainable consumption. Values, as material-discursive practices, shape the pace and direction of transitions, and for deep, system-wide sustainability transformations, it is critical to strengthen intrinsic, sustainability-aligned values. Public policy is especially well-positioned in this regard since policy shapes the discourse as well as the space for action. Our findings, however, reveal how market connotations frame Swedish sustainable consumption policy within a growth logic, where the public is to facilitate the market by removing barriers for the consumer while encouraging business innovation. As such, the Swedish policy discourse essentially reproduces a so-called improve discourse on sustainable consumption and reinforces extrinsic values of power and achievement. The scope of sustainable consumption is occasionally expanded, particularly in alignment with a shift discourse that emphasizes the move toward a circular economy. However, despite elements of benevolence and universalism in the overarching framing of the Generational Goal, these efforts remain overshadowed and co-opted by the extrinsically focused dominant market framing. Thus, we find limited potential for the policy discourse to help foreground more diverse values essential for deep transformations. Acknowledging the challenges of disentangling values in written policy documents, we call for future research to explore value tensions in practical policy-implementation contexts.

Sustainability Science Practice and PolicyVol. 21(1)
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.