Feasibility study of a general model for synthetic CT generation in MRI-guided extracranial radiotherapy

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single general model to synthesize CT images across body sites, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, to support treatment planning for MRI-only radiotherapy. A total of 157 patients who received MRI-guided radiation therapy in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis on a 0.35T MRIdian Linac were included. A subset of 122 cases were used for model training and the remaining 35 cases were used for model validation. All patient datasets had semi-paired CT-simulation image and 0.35T MR image acquired using TrueFISP. A conditional generative adversarial network with a multi-planar method was used to generate synthetic CT images from 0.35T MR images. The effect of preprocessing methods (with and without bias field corrections) on the quality of synthetic CT was evaluated and found to be insignificant. The general models trained on all cases performed comparably to the site-specific models trained on individual body sites. For all models, the peak signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 31.7 to 34.9 and the structural index similarity measures ranged from 0.9547 to 0.9758. For the datasets with bias field corrections, the mean-absolute-errors in HU (general model versus site-specific model) were 49.7 ± 9.4 versus 49.5 ± 8.9, 48.7 ± 7.6 versus 43 ± 7.8 and 32.8 ± 5.5 versus 31.8 ± 5.3 for the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, respectively. When comparing plans between synthetic CTs and ground truth CTs, the dosimetric difference was on average less than 0.5% (0.2 Gy) for target coverage and less than 2.1% (0.4 Gy) for organ-at-risk metrics for all body sites with either the general or specific models. Synthetic CT plans showed good agreement with mean gamma pass rates of >94% and >99% for 1%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using a general model for multiple body sites and the potential of using synthetic CT to support an MRI-guided radiotherapy workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add26b
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility study of a general model for synthetic CT generation in MRI-guided extracranial radiotherapy

Atchar Sudhyadhom, Jonathan E. Leeman, Ritchell van Dams, Yue-Houng Hu et al.
1 citations
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
article

Feasibility study of a general model for synthetic CT generation in MRI-guided extracranial radiotherapy

Atchar Sudhyadhom, Jonathan E. Leeman, Ritchell van Dams, Yue-Houng Hu, Raymond H. Mak, Zhaohui Han, Shu‐Hui Hsu, D. Ferguson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single general model to synthesize CT images across body sites, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, to support treatment planning for MRI-only radiotherapy. A total of 157 patients who received MRI-guided radiation therapy in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis on a 0.35T MRIdian Linac were included. A subset of 122 cases were used for model training and the remaining 35 cases were used for model validation. All patient datasets had semi-paired CT-simulation image and 0.35T MR image acquired using TrueFISP. A conditional generative adversarial network with a multi-planar method was used to generate synthetic CT images from 0.35T MR images. The effect of preprocessing methods (with and without bias field corrections) on the quality of synthetic CT was evaluated and found to be insignificant. The general models trained on all cases performed comparably to the site-specific models trained on individual body sites. For all models, the peak signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 31.7 to 34.9 and the structural index similarity measures ranged from 0.9547 to 0.9758. For the datasets with bias field corrections, the mean-absolute-errors in HU (general model versus site-specific model) were 49.7 ± 9.4 versus 49.5 ± 8.9, 48.7 ± 7.6 versus 43 ± 7.8 and 32.8 ± 5.5 versus 31.8 ± 5.3 for the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, respectively. When comparing plans between synthetic CTs and ground truth CTs, the dosimetric difference was on average less than 0.5% (0.2 Gy) for target coverage and less than 2.1% (0.4 Gy) for organ-at-risk metrics for all body sites with either the general or specific models. Synthetic CT plans showed good agreement with mean gamma pass rates of >94% and >99% for 1%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using a general model for multiple body sites and the potential of using synthetic CT to support an MRI-guided radiotherapy workflow.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 11(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.