ESG ratings, executive pay-for-performance sensitivity and within-firm pay gap

Addressing the factors that contribute to within-firm pay disparities has become increasingly urgent in light of growing global income inequality. This study explores the effect of corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings on pay gaps using data from Chinese-listed companies between 2017 and 2021. The findings reveal that higher ESG ratings are associated with a significant widening of the pay gap between executives and ordinary employees, primarily driven by an increase in executive pay-for-performance sensitivity. Governance (G) emerges as the key factor amplifying this sensitivity. Heterogeneity analysis shows that this effect is particularly pronounced in non-state-owned and large-scale firms. Additionally, the impact is evident across various firms in traditional and highly competitive industries. These results suggest that regulators should pay closer attention to internal income distribution when promoting ESG principles, as a way to mitigate widening income inequality within firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04908-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG ratings, executive pay-for-performance sensitivity and within-firm pay gap

Zuoxiang Zhao, Qiuyun Zhao, Xinze Li, Xi Wang
2 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
article

ESG ratings, executive pay-for-performance sensitivity and within-firm pay gap

Zuoxiang Zhao, Qiuyun Zhao, Xinze Li, Xi Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Addressing the factors that contribute to within-firm pay disparities has become increasingly urgent in light of growing global income inequality. This study explores the effect of corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings on pay gaps using data from Chinese-listed companies between 2017 and 2021. The findings reveal that higher ESG ratings are associated with a significant widening of the pay gap between executives and ordinary employees, primarily driven by an increase in executive pay-for-performance sensitivity. Governance (G) emerges as the key factor amplifying this sensitivity. Heterogeneity analysis shows that this effect is particularly pronounced in non-state-owned and large-scale firms. Additionally, the impact is evident across various firms in traditional and highly competitive industries. These results suggest that regulators should pay closer attention to internal income distribution when promoting ESG principles, as a way to mitigate widening income inequality within firms.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Shandong University (CN), Peking University (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ESG ratings, executive pay-for-performance sensitivity and within-firm pay gap — Zuoxiang Zhao, Qiuyun Zhao, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS