Text Versus Screen: A Linguistic Comparison of Selected English Novels and Their Film Adaptations

This paper aims to analyse the linguistic features of ten English novels and their adaptations into films using Biber’s multidimensional analysis framework. The paper compares and contrasts the various linguistic features of novels and movies. Dividing each text into three equal parts, the MAT (Multidimensional Analysis Tagger) was applied. Descriptive statistics and the results of an ANOVA were then analysed using SPSS. The study indicates that movie subtitles are semantically more straightforward as they occupy limited space and time, while novels use more elaborate vocabulary. Movies are more involved, non-narrative, non-argumentative, non-abstract, and less explicit than novels. The present research contributes to the existing knowledge by providing a clearer picture of the connection between the narrative form and the linguistic manifestation and helpful information on how language adapts to the new media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1505.14
Primary Topic
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Text Versus Screen: A Linguistic Comparison of Selected English Novels and Their Film Adaptations

Sadia Ali, Tamim Aljasir
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
article

Text Versus Screen: A Linguistic Comparison of Selected English Novels and Their Film Adaptations

Sadia Ali, Tamim Aljasir
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse the linguistic features of ten English novels and their adaptations into films using Biber’s multidimensional analysis framework. The paper compares and contrasts the various linguistic features of novels and movies. Dividing each text into three equal parts, the MAT (Multidimensional Analysis Tagger) was applied. Descriptive statistics and the results of an ANOVA were then analysed using SPSS. The study indicates that movie subtitles are semantically more straightforward as they occupy limited space and time, while novels use more elaborate vocabulary. Movies are more involved, non-narrative, non-argumentative, non-abstract, and less explicit than novels. The present research contributes to the existing knowledge by providing a clearer picture of the connection between the narrative form and the linguistic manifestation and helpful information on how language adapts to the new media.

Theory and Practice in Language StudiesVol. 15(5)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.