Rural-urban flows determine internal migration structure across scales

Historically, internal migration happened through a centralization process upwards the urban hierarchy, but in recent decades, a shift towards network-based hierarchies has occurred in developed economies. This shift has led to the development of intra-urban mobility networks that reveal how different connections move populations between cities. Yet, most studies concentrate only on major cities and their networks, often overlooking the impact of smaller-scale connections. In our analysis, we show that inter-settlement migration patterns are heterogeneous across spatial scales, but a strong hierarchical structure persists across them. Results for a multi-scale community detection algorithm show that most of internal migration happens in local, clique-like groups of smaller settlements, and these cliques form larger units through connections to towns with center roles. Surprisingly, towns with similar center roles on different scales can differ by population and administrative rank. By applying the radiation model of migration as an analytic null model, we identify network patterns that cannot be explained by the population of settlements and the distance between them. We find that the radiation model fails to predict population flows from local cliques to centers, a characteristic type of observed flow that defines the hierarchic network structure. • Structure of internal migration network differs across scales. • Migration streams form locally dense clusters. • Local clusters form hierarchic structures through flows to local centers. • Clusters differ from what radiation model predicts based on distance and population only.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105992
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural-urban flows determine internal migration structure across scales

Gergely Mónus, László Lőrincz
3 citations
Cities
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Rural-urban flows determine internal migration structure across scales

Gergely Mónus, László Lőrincz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Historically, internal migration happened through a centralization process upwards the urban hierarchy, but in recent decades, a shift towards network-based hierarchies has occurred in developed economies. This shift has led to the development of intra-urban mobility networks that reveal how different connections move populations between cities. Yet, most studies concentrate only on major cities and their networks, often overlooking the impact of smaller-scale connections. In our analysis, we show that inter-settlement migration patterns are heterogeneous across spatial scales, but a strong hierarchical structure persists across them. Results for a multi-scale community detection algorithm show that most of internal migration happens in local, clique-like groups of smaller settlements, and these cliques form larger units through connections to towns with center roles. Surprisingly, towns with similar center roles on different scales can differ by population and administrative rank. By applying the radiation model of migration as an analytic null model, we identify network patterns that cannot be explained by the population of settlements and the distance between them. We find that the radiation model fails to predict population flows from local cliques to centers, a characteristic type of observed flow that defines the hierarchic network structure. • Structure of internal migration network differs across scales. • Migration streams form locally dense clusters. • Local clusters form hierarchic structures through flows to local centers. • Clusters differ from what radiation model predicts based on distance and population only.

CitiesVol. 163
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (HU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.