Using self-organizing map and rating scale model in examining internal structure of scales

This study compares the psychometric properties of scales developed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Self-Organizing Map (SOM), and Andrich's Rating Scale Model (RSM). Data for the research were collected by administering the "Statistical Attitude Scale" trial form, previously used in a separate study, to 808 individuals. First, EFA, SOM and RSM were applied to decide the number of dimensions of the scale, and to select items. Subsequently, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to the forms obtained from different methods and their CFA fit indices were compared. The analysis revealed variations in the number of dimensions and item distribution across different methods. Results indicated that the form generated using SOM exhibited the highest fit indices. Furthermore, the CFA fit indices of the form created with RSM were found to be satisfactory, offering detailed insights into both items and individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1388256
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using self-organizing map and rating scale model in examining internal structure of scales

Sinan Bekmezci, Nuri Doğan
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
article

Using self-organizing map and rating scale model in examining internal structure of scales

Sinan Bekmezci, Nuri Doğan
article en

Abstract

This study compares the psychometric properties of scales developed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Self-Organizing Map (SOM), and Andrich's Rating Scale Model (RSM). Data for the research were collected by administering the "Statistical Attitude Scale" trial form, previously used in a separate study, to 808 individuals. First, EFA, SOM and RSM were applied to decide the number of dimensions of the scale, and to select items. Subsequently, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to the forms obtained from different methods and their CFA fit indices were compared. The analysis revealed variations in the number of dimensions and item distribution across different methods. Results indicated that the form generated using SOM exhibited the highest fit indices. Furthermore, the CFA fit indices of the form created with RSM were found to be satisfactory, offering detailed insights into both items and individuals.

International Journal of Assessment Tools in EducationVol. 12(2)
Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Ankara Universitesi, Mersin Üniversitesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Inönü Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.