Exploring number of response categories in factor analysis: Implications for sample size

Factor analysis is a statistical method to explore the relationships among observed variables and identify latent structures. It is crucial in scale development and validity analysis. Key factors affecting the accuracy of factor analysis results include the type of data, sample size, and the number of response categories. While some studies suggest that reliability improves with more response categories, others find no significant relationship between the number of response categories and reliability. A key consideration is that increasing the number of response categories can introduce measurement errors, especially when there are too many categories for participants to respond accurately. The study examines how different numbers of response categories affect sample size requirements in factor analysis, particularly under misspecified and correctly specified models. MonteCarloSEM package in R was used to simulate data sets based on sample size, number of response categories, model specification, and test length. Results show that a higher number of categories helps reduce bias and improve model fit, especially in smaller samples. However, when sample sizes are small or when fewer categories are used, increasing the number of items or the number of categories can improve parameter estimation. The findings suggest that for optimal results, researchers should carefully balance sample size, number of items, and response categories, particularly in studies with categorical data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1581217
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring number of response categories in factor analysis: Implications for sample size

Fatih Orçan
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Exploring number of response categories in factor analysis: Implications for sample size

Fatih Orçan
article en

Abstract

Factor analysis is a statistical method to explore the relationships among observed variables and identify latent structures. It is crucial in scale development and validity analysis. Key factors affecting the accuracy of factor analysis results include the type of data, sample size, and the number of response categories. While some studies suggest that reliability improves with more response categories, others find no significant relationship between the number of response categories and reliability. A key consideration is that increasing the number of response categories can introduce measurement errors, especially when there are too many categories for participants to respond accurately. The study examines how different numbers of response categories affect sample size requirements in factor analysis, particularly under misspecified and correctly specified models. MonteCarloSEM package in R was used to simulate data sets based on sample size, number of response categories, model specification, and test length. Results show that a higher number of categories helps reduce bias and improve model fit, especially in smaller samples. However, when sample sizes are small or when fewer categories are used, increasing the number of items or the number of categories can improve parameter estimation. The findings suggest that for optimal results, researchers should carefully balance sample size, number of items, and response categories, particularly in studies with categorical data.

International Journal of Assessment Tools in EducationVol. 12(2)
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.