Appeal to morality or monitor and punish? Attitudes toward academic dishonesty among Swedish health science students

Abstract Academic dishonesty is a growing problem in higher education. This study examines students’ attitudes toward cheating. The sample consisted of 318 students enrolled in health science courses at a Swedish university. A survey-based quantitative approach was employed, integrating qualitative responses from open-ended questions. We investigated students’ overall attitudes, circumstances leading to cheating, the relationship between exam type and cheating tendencies, and level of awareness regarding university policies. The results show that 14.9% cheated, particularly on take-home assignments. Younger students and students at all ages further along in their education were more likely to cheat on these assignments. The qualitative responses revealed a pattern between the formal measures provided by the university and the students’ personal values and integrity related to academic honesty. The respondents believed that proctoring measures were the most effective in preventing cheating, while they had less confidence in measures based on trusting the conscience and sense of honor of students. It was also found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, students taking exams at home were more likely to cheat than those taking on-campus exams. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach combining technological systems of monitoring and control with proactive strategies aimed at promoting academic integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00489-4
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appeal to morality or monitor and punish? Attitudes toward academic dishonesty among Swedish health science students

Patrik Holm, Ulrik Terp, Christina Fjaeraa Alfredsson
Discover Education
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Appeal to morality or monitor and punish? Attitudes toward academic dishonesty among Swedish health science students

Patrik Holm, Ulrik Terp, Christina Fjaeraa Alfredsson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Academic dishonesty is a growing problem in higher education. This study examines students’ attitudes toward cheating. The sample consisted of 318 students enrolled in health science courses at a Swedish university. A survey-based quantitative approach was employed, integrating qualitative responses from open-ended questions. We investigated students’ overall attitudes, circumstances leading to cheating, the relationship between exam type and cheating tendencies, and level of awareness regarding university policies. The results show that 14.9% cheated, particularly on take-home assignments. Younger students and students at all ages further along in their education were more likely to cheat on these assignments. The qualitative responses revealed a pattern between the formal measures provided by the university and the students’ personal values and integrity related to academic honesty. The respondents believed that proctoring measures were the most effective in preventing cheating, while they had less confidence in measures based on trusting the conscience and sense of honor of students. It was also found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, students taking exams at home were more likely to cheat than those taking on-campus exams. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach combining technological systems of monitoring and control with proactive strategies aimed at promoting academic integrity.

Discover EducationVol. 4(1)
Karlstad University (SE)
Karlstads universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.