Wounded Landscape: Toxicity and Coal Extractivism in Wonorejo, Indonesia

The Adaro coal company’s 30-kilometer open pit occupies villages and rubber plantations in two towns, Balangan and Tanjung, in Indonesia. Despite the needs of Indonesia’s upstream energy industry, Adaro’s coal-based infrastructure operations have provoked toxic relations, rendering hundreds of displacements, a series of land grabbing, and numerous types of bodily harm. Within mining infrastructures, local people get entangled with the company in various stages of mining, such as coal removal, hauling, blasting, and disposal within adjacent pit. What constitutes ‘toxic’ in the context of the coal-based infrastructure in coal mining zone and what are the environmental stakes embedded in efforts to extract underground landscapes? While it engages with the diversity of livelihood practices that populate the embankments of the Adaro, this article also looks at how a polluted landscape paradoxically sustains ‘life’. This involves tracing how farmers, who depend on the rubber land and are most exposed to its harm, think and respond to toxicity. This article, set within concerns of environmental humanities, addresses this inquiry in a community of rubber farmers affected by toxic coal in Wonorejo, Indonesia. This writing builds on a month’s ethnographic fieldwork in 2023 which I investigated the everyday interactions of coal and coal-based infrastructures with Wonorejo’s social, cultural, and environmental context. Drawing on participant observation and qualitative interviews, the article explores how the local people made sense of the toxicity of coal in their lives. These complex relationships are expressed in myriad ways and particularly emanated in conflicts over livelihoods, displacement, and air pollution. I demonstrate a landscape of uncertainty as a result of people’s bodily interaction with the toxic substances produced by the combustion and circulation of coal-related materials. These forms of toxicity are informed by the literature on sociotechnical approaches to energy infrastructures which are reflected in the aforementioned set of paradoxes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Roadsides
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26034/roadsides-202501304
Primary Topic
Coal and Its By-products
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wounded Landscape: Toxicity and Coal Extractivism in Wonorejo, Indonesia

Fahmi Rizki Fahroji
Roadsides
Coal and Its By-products
article

Wounded Landscape: Toxicity and Coal Extractivism in Wonorejo, Indonesia

Fahmi Rizki Fahroji
article en

Abstract

The Adaro coal company’s 30-kilometer open pit occupies villages and rubber plantations in two towns, Balangan and Tanjung, in Indonesia. Despite the needs of Indonesia’s upstream energy industry, Adaro’s coal-based infrastructure operations have provoked toxic relations, rendering hundreds of displacements, a series of land grabbing, and numerous types of bodily harm. Within mining infrastructures, local people get entangled with the company in various stages of mining, such as coal removal, hauling, blasting, and disposal within adjacent pit. What constitutes ‘toxic’ in the context of the coal-based infrastructure in coal mining zone and what are the environmental stakes embedded in efforts to extract underground landscapes? While it engages with the diversity of livelihood practices that populate the embankments of the Adaro, this article also looks at how a polluted landscape paradoxically sustains ‘life’. This involves tracing how farmers, who depend on the rubber land and are most exposed to its harm, think and respond to toxicity. This article, set within concerns of environmental humanities, addresses this inquiry in a community of rubber farmers affected by toxic coal in Wonorejo, Indonesia. This writing builds on a month’s ethnographic fieldwork in 2023 which I investigated the everyday interactions of coal and coal-based infrastructures with Wonorejo’s social, cultural, and environmental context. Drawing on participant observation and qualitative interviews, the article explores how the local people made sense of the toxicity of coal in their lives. These complex relationships are expressed in myriad ways and particularly emanated in conflicts over livelihoods, displacement, and air pollution. I demonstrate a landscape of uncertainty as a result of people’s bodily interaction with the toxic substances produced by the combustion and circulation of coal-related materials. These forms of toxicity are informed by the literature on sociotechnical approaches to energy infrastructures which are reflected in the aforementioned set of paradoxes.

Roadsides(013)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Coal and Its By-products
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.